Pakistan's NATO blockade enters third week

Official says Pakistan will reopen the border when public anger cools down and the route is protected.


Afp December 10, 2011
Pakistan's NATO blockade enters third week

PESHAWAR: Pakistan's blockade of the vital US supply line into Afghanistan entered a third week Saturday, the longest closure of the 10-year war with no imminent sign of the border reopening.

Pakistan's fragile alliance with the United States crashed to new lows two weeks ago on November 26 when NATO air strikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers in what the Pakistan military called a deliberate attack.

US President Barack Obama telephoned President Asif Ali Zardari to offer his condolences, but Washington has stopped short of apologising pending the results of a military investigation into what happened, due December 23.

Although Pakistani and US officials dispute the precise sequence of events, Pakistan closed its two crossings to US and NATO supplies and gave American personnel until Sunday to leave an air base reportedly used by CIA drones.

Officials in the northwest, where the main Torkham crossing into Afghanistan is situated, told AFP there were no plans to reopen.

"There is strong public resentment. People are angry about this incident and we cannot take a decision in haste," one senior security official told AFP.

"Pakistan will reopen the border when public anger cools down and the route is protected," he added.

Two nights ago, gunmen destroyed at least 34 trucks in a gun and rocket attack on a NATO trucking terminal in the Balochistan.

Around 44 oil tankers and goods trucks were parked at the temporary terminal, one of three set up in and around Quetta for stranded vehicles.

No group claimed responsibility for the attack, but the Taliban have carried out similar strikes to disrupt supplies in the past.

The 140,000 foreign troops in landlocked Afghanistan rely on fuel, food and equipment brought in from outside - nearly half of which routes through Pakistan, the quickest and the cheapest supply line.

Publicly, the coalition has insisted its fight against the Taliban will not be affected. British newspaper

Pakistani-US relations, which have yet to recover from a secret American raid that killed Osama bin Laden on May 2, are considered at their lowest ebb.

The partnership is often described as an unhappy marriage of convenience in which Pakistan depends on billions of dollars of US aid and the United States depends on Pakistani logistical support for the war effort in Afghanistan.

While few expect the alliance to break down over the strikes, officials gave AFP no date for reopening the crossing.

"People are still protesting. How can we take this decision in such an atmosphere?" said a security official in the northwest.

On Thursday, around 800 people poured onto the streets in the Pakistani capital Islamabad, venting fury with the United States and NATO, demanding an end to the unpopular alliance in the war against the Taliban.

"NATO will have to apologise. They will have to provide solid security for the future," the official added.

COMMENTS (3)

avi | 12 years ago | Reply I agree with the Other Readers comments. I believe that Pakistan should keeps its borders closed to all US and NATO. I also believe that all Aid to that country should stop as well. A country that so relies on our Aid, purposfully hid Osama Bin Laden. So yes, absolutely!, shut those routes, stop all Aid. The Aid we give them will more than make up the difference in the price for our other trade routes. "“NATO will have to apologise. They will have to provide solid security for the future,” the official added." , I fear that only prayers to Allah with give your country the solid security for your futures, or you will have to do it on your own.
Khidir | 12 years ago | Reply

This is not a blockade. NATO has other slower, more expensive options - let them use them.

Close US & NATO supplies thru Pakistan - Overland or via Airspace - No passage for any USA or NATO planes or drones or equipment or fuel - NOTHING.

Any military officer or government official that placates the USA/NATO is guilty of Treason.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ