Communications Minister Kapil Sibal said talks with the Internet giants had failed to come up with a solution following complaints that he had lodged three months ago over "unacceptable" images.
"My aim is that insulting material never gets uploaded," Sibal told reporters in New Delhi. "We will evolve guidelines and mechanisms to deal with the issue.
"They will have to give us the data, where these images are being uploaded and who is doing it."
Sibal said the government supported free speech and was against censorship but that some material on the Internet was so offensive that no one would find it acceptable.
He said he had shown some of the worst images to the Internet companies, who had said they could not control all distribution.
"Three months back we saw that Google, Yahoo!, Facebook had images which could be an insult to Indians, especially religious-minded people," Sibal said.
"We told them to find a way that such insulting images are not uploaded. We gave them some time... but there was no response."
Sibal said the firms had shown that their "intention was not to cooperate" and that they had explained they were only "platforms" on which people could display material.
"I feel that this in principle was not correct but it is very clear that we will not allow such insults to happen. We are thinking and will take the next step," he said. "We will not allow our cultural ethos to be hurt."
Facebook, which has 25 million users in India, released a statement saying it "recognised the government's interest in minimising the amount of abusive content" online and would continue to communicate over the issue.
Google confirmed Monday's meeting with Sibal but made no further comment, while Yahoo! and Microsoft were not immediately available.
Sibal showed some of the offending material to journalists, including fake images of naked politicians and religious figures.
He added that "sometimes when asked for data in respect to terrorists... there is hesitation (by Internet companies) to provide that data."
The Hindustan Times on Tuesday said the Internet companies had rejected Sibal's appeal for screening, saying a huge volume of information was uploaded on to the Internet and that they were not responsible for judging its content.
The paper added that Sibal had earlier complained about a site that targeted Sonia Gandhi, the influential president of the ruling Congress party.
Congress spokesman Abhishek Manu Singhvi said the government was only acting "in respect of absolutely illegal, defamatory, pornographic or other similar kind of material".
BlackBerry maker RIM has been embroiled in a similar wrangle with India over access to encrypted email and instant message services that the government says could be used by extremists to plot attacks.
India has more than 110 million Internet users out of a population of 1.2 billion, according to latest research, with the figure likely to jump to 600 million in the next five years.
Sibal's call for Internet screening quickly attracted a storm of criticism on Twitter, with many users expressing anger over any attempt to restrict usage.
COMMENTS (26)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Prashant Hope you narrow logic understands the fact that facebook is just a platform to share things with other friends or acquaintances. If i am posting some derogatory things then it is on my profile,i am not going to post on your profile.So you don't need to get offended.It is my page and my views will be there.If you don't want to see it,then you should either block me or don't visit my page.SIMPLE. Plus,with this logic,the whole internet should be banned because it contains all kinds of derogatory things which you would not like to see.So does that mean that internet should be censored? The solution is simple you don't visit that site. This is the meaning of free expression i can express anything unless and until i don't force you to see it.
@Cynical: Problem arises when some people resort to sheer abuse, masquerading as critic.
I'm nore sure that we are in agreement on this. My point is there's no clear distinction between them -- one woman's criticism is another woman's abuse or even blasphemy. One man's censorship is another man's repression. This is subject to personal interpretation, which you can never successfully legislate. Even interpretation of vulgarity & obscenity often differs within the same family, evolves over time and is deeply personal (e.g., what do you think of mini-skirts?).
So the best remedy is a quality universal education system so those who hear the message can better judge for themselves, and to let free speech reign. If I am abusive in a political discourse, my audience's reaction to my speech will chastize me and force me to moderate so I don't alienate my audience. Karunanidhi had to do that against Jayalalitha re aspersions on her relationship with MGR, and Anna Hazare had to backtrack re the Sharad Pawar slap -- because people found their comments in poor taste. The system works.
@You Said It: I was talking about matter where we criticize someone just the sake of fun or entertainment. I am against putting ban or any kind or restriction on social network or freedom of speech. I accept that my selection of word for "nero" was wrong and I am apologizing for that.
@You Said It
I am with you when you uphold and defend peoples' right to criticize. Problem arises when some people resort to sheer abuse, masquerading as critic.
@Cynical: You seem to forget that Sonia Gandhi is an elected member of the parliament.
So? That doesn't mean people have lost the right to criticize Sonia or her origins because she got elected, or because they think that her influence is disproportional to her role as an MP. The whole point of a term-limit is that the electorate gets a second chance to raise an issue if they are out-voted the first time. If the majority thinks that all of these are non-issues, she'll be re-elected again. There's no justification to suppress dissent just because it's coming from the minority.
Worlds largest democracy LOL
This is not gonna happen, never. So chill!!
@You Said It
You seem to forget that Sonia Gandhi is an elected member of the parliament. People who voted for her are no less Indian than you are. Similarly people who voted congress to the power were aware that the party is led by Sonia Gandhi.BJP cried hoarse to her Italian origin, it didn't work.
Banning, curbing, limiting, monitoring everywhere freedom of speech is an endangered specie.
@Deb: no brother you are not understanding what I am saying. I am not against your right to express your view but it should be in polite manner and without insulting other. For example here I am expressing my view on your comment without using slang word and abusing you. hope now you will understand what I am trying to say.
@Deb: Thanks a lot. Atleast you'r comments are not vulgar and abusive. But please follow example by sending any comments in TOI, even praising the father of nation Gandhiji, first prime minister of India Pandit Nehru and current Cabinet Minister for Communications and Human Resources Mr Sibal, you will see the result within no time and taste the freedom of speech.
@Prashant and @Sanjay Sharma You may not be aware of it, but your line of arguement is very similar to that of Taliban.
So you want India to be like China,Pakistan,North Korea and some Middle eastern countries.
@Sanjay Sharma: U are absolutely right.
This is why old people should move out of decision making positions in democratic government. Does Mr Sibal know anything about freedom of speech and expression ?
Just Wow. had this been Pakistan, we Indians would ve been all over this one. A lesson learnt....
@Prashant
Barking at the wrong tree.
@antanu: the so called Indian: no, another china,
Indians with Indian attitude, nothing surprising!
I am all for the freedom of speech in a democratic country like India. However I have seen quite a large chunk of vulgar remarks/comments from insane persons against few persons including current politicians, whom these persons didn't agree on some issues. Critisism is something very consturctive excersice but abusive and crass vulguar language/ideas must not be encouraged by society itself. I am aghast to see some extremely abusive language against top leaders of Indian political class during the period of anti-corruption campaign. Even if someone has seconded the opinion of anoyone of these top leaders on the current issue, he is doomed to face all sorts of hostility and vulgarity in comments. If you dont't believe me, please send your comments to Times of India praising any top Indian leaders, like Dr Manmohan Singh, Mrs Sonia Gandhi, Digvijay Singh etc. Soon you'll see a volley of all kinds of abusive remarks and comments from many quarters. If you write to the management against such acts, nobody would hear. Is it not for the TOI management, and the likes, to look into those vulgar comments and stop on thier own before it malign the subject personality? Here lies the point where the service providers should themselves draw a clear line. People may disagree with me but I find blogs and comments in the ET/the Dawn/the News in Pakistan in better light because of lack of vulgarity and abusive language. Freedom of speech doesn't allow anyone to abuse others whom he differs on a perticular issue.
@Nero: Freedom of speech comes with some responsibility also. it gives you power to put your views and not to insult others. Hope your tiny mind will understand this difference .
I think it is more of individual job to not upload defamatory pics or words be it regarding politicians or religious figures of any religion. the fact is that world is increasingly going morally bankrupt resulting in such things. We need to condemn such attitude.
I am an Indian and I think Mr Sibal has gone mad. This is outrageous. Freedom of speech and expression is now under threat in India. Who is anyone to stop someone from expressing his/her views - be it blasphemous, sexual or whatever.
LOL...another Pakistan in the making......?
Oh please Bhaarti bhais, don't block/remove Veena's pictures!