The army chief also explained why the November 26 air strike at Salala was not responded to: “Timely decision could not be taken due to breakdown of communication with the affected posts and therefore lack of clarity of situation at various levels, including corps HQ and GHQ”. Now he wants the troops on the border with Afghanistan to take their own on-the-spot decision against any future Nato attacks without waiting for orders from the GHQ. And for that they would be supplied with appropriate weapons. Now they will have to worry about dealing with US-Isaf forces in addition to Taliban terrorists.
This is, by all accounts, a very rash approach to the situation triggered by the November 26 incident, even if it is directed, as a morale-booster, at the troops and meant to be interpreted differently as strategy by civil society, which is obviously not prepared for war on the western front. Moreover, one wonders why what should be inter-army directives are being made public, though it may be surmised that this is due to the perception following the attack that the army was not responding strongly enough to an attack on Pakistani territory.
Meanwhile, the Americans are offering regrets even before their formal inquiry into the Salala incident is completed on December 21. President Obama, too, has expressed sorrow at the death of Pakistani troops, though a formal apology is yet to come. There are, however, statements being issued from Washington saying the attack was unintended and that some fire had come from around the Salala check post.
Pakistan has already taken the crucial step of banning supply trucks taking fuel and equipment to Afghanistan through its territory, in the process cutting nearly half of Nato/Isaf’s total supplies. Add to this the notice on Shamsi base and it becomes a very palpable challenge to the very presence of Nato troops in Afghanistan. Russia, which has offered a northern supply route to the Nato forces since 2009, has also threatened to cut it off because of the deployment by the US of a ‘missile defence’ cordon around Russia. The decision not to attend the Bonn Conference on the future of Afghanistan seems a bit excessive because of its isolationist intent and hopefully will be subject to revision later on.
The nation is already of one mind, a kind of pre-war symptom that Pakistan experienced in 1965 and 1971 when the army painted the country into a corner through the hubris of isolationism. It is not natural that the entire nation be of uniform thinking in favour of conflict, especially if this conflict is against an immeasurably stronger adversary. If after the anger felt in the GHQ — and equally by ordinary Pakistanis on the street — subsides, more realistic decisions are required to be taken, the disappointment among the public will take the shape of an emotional boomerang of self-disgust. We have seen that happen in the Raymond Davis case after the CIA agent was let off on diyat instead of being publicly hanged. If the common man has succumbed to an attack of ‘ghairat’ and is spoiling for a fight with the US, the state cannot afford to indulge in the bravado of an unequal war.
If the pro-war mind is presuming that the Taliban will fight the Nato-US forces side by side with the Pakistan Army, putting an end to the problem of law and order in Pakistan, it is sadly deceived. It will in fact be a two-front war, one front being at the back of the Pakistani troops. The Taliban and their master al Qaeda have an agenda that will be fulfilled only by removing our army chief from his post and then using the military to take over the country and its nuclear assets. Wisdom demands that we challenge the US realistically rather than rashly, compelling it to make amends for the Salala incident to the benefit of Pakistan.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 3rd, 2011.
COMMENTS (17)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
I totally back the decision taken by Gen.Kayani.. Those soldiers should have been given the right and resources for their self defence, but, better late than never...It is widely believed among well informed quarters that CIA ordered this attack on pakistani post in revenge, as Pakistani soldiers were efficiently fighting CIA send terrorists or taliban that were trying to destabilize pakistan.
" The Taliban and their master al Qaeda have an agenda that will be fulfilled only by removing our army chief from his post and then using the military to take over the country and its nuclear assets" well well a maverick organization like ALQAEDA cannot even think of using Pak Army. this assertion appears to be a wild dream.
I agree and disagree with the writer. It is true we should not make rash decisions but this decision was necessary as these cross border attacks have to stop. They jeopardize the Territorial Integrity of Pakistan which is the right of any Sovereign nation. It was required that we show the aggressors that the next time they try and wander into Pakistan they better have body bags ready back home.
wow, how easily writer has showed us that the taliban can take hold of army and nukes if we go in war with US and Nato. it seems as if you think it is very easy for talibans to do this and they have more power than pak army. if this is so, then pak army can beat US and Nato. @ Tehrik e insaf Fata I agree with you and appreciate you comments. Its all about realising others about your sovereignty and not engaging in war with them.
What wisdom...? Will you ever grow up ET?
@MarkH
Kindly Google on "Scientific Method" and look at the importance of OBSERVATION. Reason alone is impotent without the support of reality, aka observation. Asking the Taliban for their views rather than assigning opinions to them on the basis of so-called "common sense", would be an application of the scientific method.
This is all public posturing nothing more. Pakistan cannot dig its own grave
@ Editorial: Why do you people always portray the the affairs as "Stopping Cooperation with NATO means going to War with them"... We don't need to fight the US and NATO... We just "Mind our Business... Simple"... 1) Stop NATO Supplies (Pakistan is not a member of NATO nor a state of US, so no obligation of any type. Its a mutual agreement and Pakistan has every right to back-off... Where is the WAR in this?) 2) Ask NATO to stop using Pakistani airspace for military purposes e.g. Drones (Simple logic of Point 1 applies here too... No need for a WAR here too)... 3) Ask NATO and Afghan forces to guard the Afghan border if they feel threatened..... If there is any infiltration, they are allowed to pursue the militants within Afghanistan... Pakistan, for its part, will try to STOP any such activities from its land.... Thats all... Even then if they feel that Infiltration is there, they should MINE and FENCE the border to stop it... Simple... No NEED for a WAR here too... @Cautious: If you are a Pakistani then "Stop the SELF-LOATHING attitude".... We dont NEED a war with US ? NATO.. If you are not a Pakistani then "No Comments"
I fear that a check post will fire a few machine gun shots at any passing helicopter and NATO will bring in the high altitude bombers
@alami musafir: Common sense and an average or better ability to reason.
Though very tragic, this incident is making the Pak army taking an irreversible stand of doing everything opposite to the interests of Pakistan No point in delegating authority to the posts. What happens if "communication breaks down again" due to attacks/faulty equipments etc. Will every post be equipped with hefty armoury? Skipping Bonn conference is not good Pakistan, It will give other countries to bash Pakistan again and its view points will not be explained/considered, It will be tough to go against the resolutions of those 90 countries, whatever it may be The civilian govt is put into the forefront to take all the postures and blame while the army is talking bravado. No proper explanation from the Army for OBL episode/Mehran incident and now this. It is all a mess.
"If the pro-war mind is presuming that the Taliban will fight the Nato-US forces side by side with the Pakistan Army, putting an end to the problem of law and order in Pakistan, it is sadly deceived."
Pray, how do you know this ? Have you asked them ? And if so, can you name the source ? This is the opportunity that ET should seize, and get your reporter to actually ask the Taliban bigwigs what their plans are. Would really be a scoop and would make matters much clearer.
It is not natural that the entire nation be of uniform thinking in favour of conflict, especially if this conflict is against an immeasurably stronger adversary. . May not be natural to the rest of the World but it's a natural tendency for xenophobic cultures who's leaders blame the outside world for all their problems. The same Pakistani's who believe their govt is corrupt and lies on a regular basis suddenly believe anything these guys say when it comes to slamming India, USA, Russia, Israel, etc etc.
Bravo now kayani talking like real rajputs jaye man.
writer please explain wisdom.daily killing by nato and enjoy suffering killing with laughing till pakistan is finished.or till islamabad is also bombed because extremists are everywhere in the minds of west.u are great wise please explain what to do with united states.bow in front of them.we had already bowed and obeying them.still they kill us.what further wisdom u explain please