The cabinet’s decision to boycott a crucial conference in Bonn, Germany on the Afghan endgame was endorsed by the parliamentary committee on national security on Friday. The conference, which has been planned for a year, will be attended by 90 countries on Monday.
The bicameral parliamentary panel was tasked to frame Pakistan’s new terms of engagement in the US-led war against terrorism afterlast week’s attacks in Mohmand Agency that killed 25 troops. The 17-member parliamentary committee, headed by Senator Raza Rabbani had representatives from all parties with presence in either of the two houses of parliament.
The prime minister, foreign minister and director-general of Military Operations briefed the committee in the closed-door session.
“We have been told that the US will be vacating Shamsi Airbase soon. We wanted to know the status of their (US) bases in Jacobabad and Pasni, but no concrete answer was given,” a participant of the meeting told The Express Tribune.
Three committee members from nationalist parties, Asfandyar Wali, Shahid Bugti and Mir Israrullah Zehri did not participate. The absence of Asfandyar Wali, chief of PPP’s coalition partner Awami National Party, raised eyebrows in the meeting.
In a briefing to journalists after the meeting, the information minister said the committee had endorsed the decisions taken by the federal cabinet and defence committee of the cabinet not to attend the Bonn conference. She ducked some specific questions since all information could not be made public.
There was no word if the suspension of Nato’s supply routes was permanent. However, one of the participants said that the issue was part of the committee’s agenda.
“The authorities (military) could not give any satisfactory answers over continued drone attacks,” another member said.
“The committee has been tasked to formulate the overall terms of reference in 10-15 days that would be put forward before the joint session of the parliament,” a treasury member said. He said the next meeting of the committee has been convened on December 8.
Prime minister’s briefing
In his opening remarks, Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani claimed Pakistan’s ‘red lines’ - including no infringement of Pakistan’s territorial integrity and sovereignty - have been made abundantly clear to the United States, Nato and Isaf. “We also conveyed, in no uncertain terms, to the US and Nato forces that these attacks will have consequences,” he said.
He said it was regrettable that Pakistan’s willingness to cooperate with the international community on counterterrorism has not been understood properly.
He said Pakistan’s enormous sacrifices and contribution in the campaign against militancy has not been adequately acknowledged. What is worse is the tendency to make Pakistan a scapegoat for the failings of international policies in Afghanistan, Gilani added.
The country’s efforts to improve relations with Afghanistan and support Afghan-led and Afghan-owned efforts for peace and reconciliation have also been misconstrued and actively subverted by certain quarters.
“Clearly, there is a limit to our patience. Cooperation cannot be a one-way street. Under these challenging and difficult circumstances, Pakistan has maintained a principled approach and exercised utmost restraint.” However, he said it would be a grave miscalculation on anyone’s part that stability and peace in Afghanistan can be restored or maintained by destabilising Pakistan.
Gilani said instructions have been issued to all units of the armed forces to respond, with full force, to any act of aggression and infringement of Pakistan’s territorial frontiers.
Our continued cooperation in this regard can only be premised on a partnership that is consistent with Pakistan’s national interests and respect for Pakistan’s sovereignty, independence and absolutely zero-tolerance for any transgression against Pakistan’s state frontiers.
“Pakistan does not seek aid or economic assistance from the United States. What we seek, in fact demand, is respect for our sovereignty and territorial integrity, a firm and categorical commitment on “inviolability” of Pakistan’s borders and on non-recurrence of such incidents.”
(Read: Wisdom better than rash bravado)
Published in The Express Tribune, December 3rd, 2011.
COMMENTS (27)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Babar F.:
Very true, but for that to happen you need leaders who are not corrupt. Can you truly say that that is the case with the current political & military leaders, or for the matter the leaders who have preceded them over the last 50 years?
Lret us not kid ourselves. The U.S. gives Pakistan billions of dollars of aid, on which the corrupt political and military leaders feast. After 40 days of chest thumping and spitting vitrol against the U.S., these corupt leaders will go back to the old arramgements, as they have done time and again. In the final analysis, money trumps all other matters for these corrupt leaders. I am surprised there are so many ignorant posters on this site who believe otherwise.
Perhaps this is a good way to vent your frustrations against the U.S., but you are simply overlooking the problem with the incompetent and corrupt leaders. And until you recognize the underlying root cause of the problem, you will remain ignorant and Pakistan will continue to be one of the least respected, laughing stock country. Wake up, folks.
Finally some dignity showing but it should be implemented as well, not just tall claims.
@Ch Allah Daad: Running away from what problem? With he memory of so many soldiers killed in an attack how could the Pakistani government crassly continue on as though it were business as usual? If anything, Pakistan has allowed itself to be made the scapegoat for far too long, especially since Pakistan continues to pay the highest price in the current war. If no one understand this, there is no point in Pakistan going to any conference. Do you forget that the whole mess in Pakistan was created when the region was abandoned by the West after Pakistan helped defeat the Soviets?
This is most terrible decision. Pakistan must face the world and plead its case. Running away from the problem is not a solution.
Please explain how excluding yourselves from a process you have been begging to be involved in helps Pakistan. It would appear that the only reason you wanted to be involved in the first place was to appear important - if so, Bonn will do fine without your presence.
AWESOME DECISION! Well when there were rumors that the PM might send ambassador to the conference I was really hoping for something like ZAB did in Simla Conference. That would have been more awesome! That was the best way to get out of the war on Terrorism.
Anyways thumbs up for the decision and please stick to it now.
Gilani Sir. Thinking how to get Dollars because the heart locker America is now a days not Good with Pakistan... so he is worried about transmission of Dollars... Geo our Prime Minister... The Dollars Bank.....
NSC decision is in line with the nation's pulse.US,NATO,ISAF,Afghanistan can all go to hell.
@Bangladeshi: As if the world has never experienced a stubborn bother in an agreement. Being obstinate only means the end decision will leave Pakistan out completely and treat it as a possible hostile. The world won't stop for Pakistan. It just means the best case scenario would be disappointingly gone. Unless you can quote a time from history where regional policies favored the negative influences and waited for them, rather than just either going around or through them.
I am glad to see that Pakistan has started going into the right direction.
The exclusivity of a Pakistani is that once a Pakistani says NO, it means NO and there is no if and but.
If we act in a similar manner, we would be able to run the country according to the desire of Qauaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah.
Enough with anti-Pakistan Nato & Afghan schemes. We should never have compromised our sovereignty in the first place by listening to their self-serving theories. Now just get out of their game plan and start on the "tough path" of self-reliance, without it you have no dignity or honor to claim.
Is that all Pakistan does when attacked??? Boycott a conference??? The defence forces are supposed to DEFEND right????
Salute to democracy and firm stand of army with them.
Let the American's deal with the invisible Talibans' themselves. This is the smart way of taking revenge rather than involving in war with NATO.
Salute to democracy and firm of army with them.
That's the right decision now the govt should stick to it
After all the humiliation & loses the PAK experienced from their NATO "ally" they should at least boycott this "good for nothing paper conference". Why are you guys mumbling of whether to go or not? Without PAK any AF solution won't see the light of day.
nice!
Good decision on Pakistan's part!!! May God bless you all and you become victorious.
Now please stand by this decision
Thumps up!!!!
Great Decision...Better to avoid them
What difference will it make...? but its a good symbolic gesture.
Finally some guts. The US should apologize and Obama should apologize publicly.