For these reasons, we would like to believe that he intends to do what he says; that he would genuinely like to be in command of his own ship and, in the hypothetical situation that he assumes power, have all others playing a role in the running of the state follow his directions. Imran is, of course, right when he says this is how things should be. The question is whether this can truly be the case. Successive governments have struggled to control the army, with its history of a hold on power — either directly or from behind a curtain that veils its actions to some degree. The ISI, which over the years has grown multiple tentacles that reach into virtually every nook and cranny of state, is in many ways even harder to manage. Indeed, there is some doubt if it is controlled by anyone at all, or if it has split into different groups with a life of their own. If the PTI chief can do what he says he intends to, it would be a huge achievement because that is how institutions should work in a truly functioning democracy. But he may find the going tougher than anticipated when the time actually comes to put his words into action.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 15th, 2011.
COMMENTS (12)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
It is encouraging that the express tribune, at editorial level, is not biased and can appreciate the rays of hope. Otherwise,there are many who are disappointed and no more believe in the public.
If there,s someone who can contain militry establishment he,s only and only imran khan. che,lk succeed or not it,s an otheqg
Mission impossible
@Cautious: I suggest that you change the paradigm of your thought process as it would not only seriously harm the people surrounding you but also your own life. We wouldnt have Pakistan if majority of people of then sub-continent had the mentality like yours.
Nothing personal, it just that we should never have negative approach when taking up the task. Try the positive approach and it would do wonders for you :).
Last but not the least, King Khan is the only option any sane, patriotic Pakistani has in the current political options.
@Falcon: You are wrong. Institutions are not subordinated to a person but other institutions. In a democracy the army and other state institutions which are executive in nature should be subordinated to directly elected political authority, which in Pakistan's case will be prime minister, irrespective of the person occupying the post. That is how institutions are built and supposed to work. If institutions start to pick their loyalty based on supposed moral authority of elected rulers then there would be chaos and institutional deadlock.
Never ever let ISI under corrupt civilian government.
ISI is Pakistan's strongest defence which really is giving hell of ride to all its adversaries. indians really enjoyed the cream, now americans are tasting it.
@Cautious: "Zardari tried to get the ISI to report to him — they said No"...please understand that even if Mr. Zardari were to ask a kid to do the same...he/she would politely decline...that's because it is not always a person's position that defines power and scope of influence, rather indisputable moral legitimacy...which unfortunately our current leadership lacks...
well at least ik's intention is clear. Maybe he Will succeed where zardari couldn't. Even if he doesn't...at least he Will try.
If he could get both the army and ISI to publicly agree it would work wonders. After all, there's no reason for them to not say such a setup is acceptable if they were truly willing to let it happen without a fight.
That oddly sounds unrealistic in Pakistani politics which is precisely the worth of the statement. You won't find other countries who have subjugated their military and intelligence agencies having any problems with those groups saying it's true when asked even publicly as it does no harm to their activities. Not just that, for veteran countries in the area, it's almost not worth asking because they know the answer.
Zardari tried to get the ISI to report to him -- they said No. It is likely that the American's, Taliban and ISI will not cooperate with Khan's political agenda - it's also likely that Khan will have little impact on the corruption that seems entrenched into Pakistan's bureaucracy. I wonder what the Pakistani people do when they realize that they elected is "all show and no go"?