Qaddafi’s corpse casts shadow

Qaddafi's burial has split the new Libya between those who want to move away from his legacy, and revenge-seekers.


Hassaan Khan October 25, 2011

At the close of Qaddafi’s brutal regime, one would look forward to a Libya that wouldn’t be marred by the rather distasteful and unIslamic manner in which his body was kept in cold storage in Misrata. Before Qaddafi was buried at an unknown location, hundreds of Libyans had queued up to view his corpse, as reports surfaced that Libya’s interim rulers ended the public display of the bodies of Qaddafi, his son and the army chief after four days, during which time thousands of Libyans came to see for themselves that the dictator was really dead.

However, the question is not one of whether the public display was finally halted; the issue arises from the principles at stake in the first few days of a new Libya. While foreign allies of the anti-Qaddafi rebels had expressed concern about the treatment of Qaddafi, both after his capture and after his death, there should be a high-level of disquiet about the new leaders promise to respect human rights. Does the same treatment await thousands of Qaddafi loyalists?

Meanwhile, Qaddafi’s will surfaced and in it, he expressed the desire to be buried next to his ‘family and friends’ in his birthplace, Sirte — the centre of the loyalist last stand against the rebels.

The document, in English translation, says: “This is my will. I, Muammar Qaddafi, do swear that there is no other God but Allah and that Mohammad is God’s Prophet, peace be upon him. I pledge that I will die as Muslim. Should I be killed, I would like to be buried, according to Muslim rituals, in the clothes I was wearing at the time of my death and my body unwashed, in the cemetery of Sirte, next to my family and relatives.”

Subsequently, the official Egyptian news agency said Libya’s office for fatwas, or religious decrees, had declared Qaddafi was not a Muslim as he had denied the teachings of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and, therefore, should not be given an Islamic funeral.

And so the people of new Libya and its new leaders were left with what was possible their toughest decisions yet, because even as a corpse, Qaddafi casts a shadow over Libya’s new beginning. However, in principle, to avoid further disgrace, the wrangling within the National Transitional Council’s (NTC) faction must end and it ought to act swiftly and honourably. The NTC leaders wanted Qaddafi buried at a “secret, unknown location in the desert so the place does not become a shrine” — a bizarre concern from a council that believed only a handful of Libyans truly cherished the deposed dictator. Either way, granted that their concerns can be validated, the burial should have taken place wherever they may wish, according to Islamic law as Qaddafi’s will states his Muslim beliefs and desire to be buried in the Islamic tradition and it would be paramount for the government to leave further judgment to God.

Furthermore, Seif alIslam Qaddafi, one of Qaddafi’s sons, is said to be still at large. This time around, it would be best if he isn’t also killed out of hand, or if at the very least the NTC and the international community can caution their fighters that the new Libya is one that is governed by the law of the land, not kerbside justice or mob rule.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 26th, 2011.

COMMENTS (10)

arshad | 12 years ago | Reply

@Umayr Masud: I do not hate Qaddafi because of his believes. He has done so many good deeds for his own people apart from relegious freedom such as free houses, cheap fuel and free education. He also sent petroliam student to abroad for further study. I can estimate that more than thousand students came and study in my town. I had honour to look after them and help them for their accommodation, helping them in their social problems, providing halal food and welcome them in our local mosque, arranged Arabic Speakers for their functions enjoyed myself Arab food, invited them for feast. Qaddafi is the person who provided funds to Pakistan for atomic programme and also great supporter for free Kashmir. He wanted to see Muslim countries to be united against imperialism. I just can not agree with his religious believes. This my honest openion.

arshad | 12 years ago | Reply

@Umayr Masud and others: First of all I could not get his Arabic GREEN BOOK, so I have not read it myself. I have been co-ordinator for Lybian students for last ten in my town. Most of students told me their views plus I have lot of Lybians living in my town who only left Libya because they could not perform 5 times prayers in their own country. Where as they have religious freedom in non-muslim country. This is the reason the Sheikhs (Ullamas) of libya did not allow him to bury according to Muslim rites. Any person who disrespect the hadith of our prophet SAW, he can not be a Muslim. Please read the faith of Rashad Khalifa on internet (www.islamicweb.com/beliefs/cults/submitters.htm or www.masjidtucson.org/publications/books/qhi/qhi.html). There is not much difference of faith between Rashad Khalifa of Egypt and Qaddafi of Libya.

I agree with most of readers that Qaddafi should not be killed by NTC forces or fighter especially when he begged for mercy and reminded the youth whatever they were doing was HARAM. He did not deserve this treatment. I feel sorry for him but we should know how he killed his own political opponents and prisoners in jails. He called the freedom fighters as RATS, but he himself found from a drain pipe (Rat hole). Such a punishment was given to him from Allah for his crime of Gustaq-e-rasool.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ