Agriculture subsidies

The government stops spending on necessary programmes, without coming up with better alternatives.

Editorial October 23, 2011

This newspaper has been strongly in favour of the government’s attempts to balance its budget, even when this has meant some sacrifice on the part of citizens. What we find disappointing, however, is when the government stops spending on necessary programmes, without coming up with better alternatives. A classic case of this was the removal of the subsidy on loans to the agriculture sector, a move expected to save the federal government billions of rupees a year.

Unto itself, this policy decision by the economic coordination committee (ECC) of the cabinet has merit. It removes a subsidy that, according to former State Bank governor Ishrat Hussain, disproportionately benefits richer farmers and does little to improve access to credit for smaller farmers. And it also saves the government money at a time when cutting expenses has become a critical priority for the country’s economic management team. Yet there are several concerns. The government has not come up with any alternative policies designed to improve access to credit for small farmers who collectively constitute some of the poorest elements of Pakistani society. We would understand if the government had a better idea than subsidies and indeed would applaud them for it. But they appear to not even have made the effort to come with one. We consider that to be a dereliction of duty on the part of the ECC and the finance ministry. The most effective way to raise the rural population out of poverty is to help them increase their productivity, a process that requires investment, which in turn needs access to capital. The Zarai Taraqiati Bank (ZTBL) has largely been a failure in providing this but that does not mean that the goal is not worth pursuing. The government might, for instance, try recapitalising and reorganising the ZTBL so that it becomes a more effective lending institution. It could also encourage the provinces to expedite the process of computerising land records, so that poor farmers have authentic documentation of their assets, which they might be able to pledge as collateral to banks.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 24th, 2011.


Most Read


Dr. Who! | 9 years ago | Reply Thank you for speaking up on the subject. Over all bureaucratic mindset is to punish rural farm producer in favor of urban consumer, since the latter is organized and vocal. Whimisical bureaucratic decisions such as imposing export ban on agriculture produce to bring down prices by causing glut in the market, commodity movement restrictions and artificial price imposition on the produce without any consideration for the investment, labour, transportation are a few examples of bureautic tricks. Also creating artificial shortage of commodities such as wheat, sugar, cooking oil and other necessities, bureaucracy paves the way for non bid imports through favourate contractors to line their pockets. Please keep up your good work since the poor farmer of Pakistan is without any voice in high places.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ