On/off/on

The precedent that would be set if Afridi rushed back into the team would be harmful for long-term health of the game.


Editorial October 20, 2011

A Pakistani cricketer announcing his retirement isn’t saying farewell to the game. It’s more like a see you later. In the musical chairs that is Pakistani cricket, the departure of Pakistan Cricket Board chairman Ijaz Butt and coach Waqar Younis was sure to be accompanied by the return of Shahid Afridi. Keeping count of the number of times Afridi has un-retired requires an advanced degree in mathematics, a sign that the all-rounder is so petulant that he packs his bags and runs home every time things don’t go his away. Despite that, the natural reaction of cricket fans will be to welcome his return. Butt was by far the most despised chairman in our cricket history while Afridi’s charisma and talent, which far outstripped his achievements, made him one of the most popular cricketers in the country.

This is a temptation that should be avoided. The precedent that would be set if Afridi rushed back into the team would be harmful for the long-term health of the game. It would show any player that they simply have to throw a tantrum to get the changes they want. It would undermine the captain and sow the seeds of discord in a team that has always had a problem with factionalism and revolt.

There are very few things about which Ijaz Butt was correct, but the harmful rise of player power was one of them. Afridi was supposed to be a servant of Pakistan cricket; yet he treated the game like he was above it. What is truly maddening about this is that Afridi’s value to the team isn’t as high as someone like Younus Khan, another player who had a falling out with Butt. He was unfairly stripped off the captaincy and dropped from the team, very soon after leading the country to victory at the T20 championships. Yet he bided his time and made a return to the team. Afridi, by contrast, let the country down and for that his career should now come to a close.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 21st, 2011.

COMMENTS (4)

Afridi Fan | 12 years ago | Reply I believe Shahid Afridi used the wrong term when he spoke "retirement". I think the correct term Shahid Afridi should have used is "strike" in his speeches/public announcements. People all around the world go on strike to fight for better working conditions. Afridi was simply fighting for his right to be treated better and to be working in a better environment.
shah | 12 years ago | Reply

totally agree with the editorial, NO PLACE FOR SUCH DOUBLE MINDED AND SELFISH AND PEOPLE LIKE HIM IN CRICKET

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ