Sporadic attempts to deal with the education problem have largely failed because they overlooked the origins of the cleavage that alienates the majority, reserving modern, English-medium education for the privileged few. By not stressing a common curriculum in institutions across the country, those at the helm of affairs have accepted a situation that creates divisions at the source, denying the lower and lower-middle income groups any chance of providing their children with quality education and therefore a secure future.
The solution must therefore begin with identifying and formulating a widely accepted common curriculum for schools across the country, both private and public. While we go about modernising the common curriculum, relevant authorities must be directed to mould the system into one that encourages skill development and discourages old, unhealthy habits like rote learning. As the subjects and syllabi are revised, so too must the examination system into one whose integrity is beyond question. When the system produces educated individuals who in turn become part of the system, an automatic correction may result. The integrity of the examination system can be safeguarded by initially including educationists from the public/private sector, both from Pakistan and from abroad, until enough human resource is trained locally. The system can be duly accredited by a foreign examination board.
Education reforms that overlook the reality and demographics of those they are meant to impact are bound to fail. We need to be mindful that over a long period of education neglect, a system has evolved where children start earning the family bread from their early years. Therefore, the proposed modification must make room for children whose work is essential for their families to survive. Running dual shifts and accommodating distance learning must therefore be an integral part of education reform.
Once a uniform curriculum has been approved, the next important step will be the training of teachers. This is no small challenge. Again, while in the long term, this problem will solve itself, the government will need to act proactively in the initial stages. Coordinated teachers’ training programmes will have to be undertaken to ensure that the quality of education being imparted is not compromised.
The next prudent step will be evaluation of the schools themselves. A credible school evaluation system like the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) in the UK should be set up to provide independent advice on matters of policy to the government. This evaluation body should carry out regular inspections of each school, public or private. Recommendations should be given for improvement in teaching, learning and management of schools.
Vocational education is another serious concern, perhaps even more important than the primary and secondary education system that must precede it. Vocational and technical education should be encouraged so that what the students learn is linked to enhancement of their skills.
One of the most important questions that confront education reform planners is the madrassa system. While it is apparent that their curricula will have to be modernised, it is also a fact worth noting that unlike our traditional education sector, these institutions provide boarding, lodging, education and meals for their students, and that too at very low cost. It thus becomes apparent why marginalised groups would prefer enrolling their children in madrassas. So, similar facilities should be provided for in mainstream public schools as well. On the whole, we should be spending eight per cent of our GDP on education annually.
By investing in the children and youth of today, we make an active investment in the Pakistan of tomorrow.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 5th, 2011.
COMMENTS (19)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Q: Mush-the Commando, used to show muscle to his own poor countrymen. Now the commando is a great Pakistani leader on Facebook and 429,186 people (most of them overseas Pakistanis) like him on FB. This commando, who doesn't have a "skin" any more is painted as our next saviour- LOLz. God bless my country.
Thanks God! Humayun Dollar Khan also thinks about this country and its people. His father was one of the most powerful men during Zia regime but instead of doing something good for the people, he amassed billions of dollars for his sons. Humayun himself was a federal minister but he never supported such an idea. I am sure he will forget what he has written as soon as he is in power again.
@John B: I strongly disagree.. Suppose a child who is in grade one right now he might be five-seven years old and in 15-16 years he would be an active member of society. There is a lot of difference between 60 years and 15 years.
Nations that develop depend on their youth not on the old and the retired.
Please come forward and form a strong group under the leadership of Mr. Musharraf. This is no time to divide in units. The time is to develop a strong a group of honest and sincere people for whom Pakistan comes first..
Chairman Mao type articles wont help now! Its too late. Window of opportunity lost forever.
Increase the number of enemies outside and inside, increase the defense budget, rob the poorest of the poor in the name of "national interest". My dear writer, do you have enough courage to tell us about the causes of our ignorance instead of lecturing on the importance of education. Moreover, how would you get the "strategic depth" if poor Allah Rakha and Pista Khan will be able to get their kids educated?
We might also want to ban beatings of 12 year old girls for misspellings.
Sir,
I think the problem is that education is a long-term investment whose fruits are only evident after many years. Our politicians are myopic and out to maximize visible, short-term gains. Even then the job they do is pretty woeful.
And now with education transferred to the provinces with their limited technical and absorptive capaity, we just threw the baby out with the bath-water.
If our leaders the MNAs/MPAs have dubious sources of income and don’t pay taxes, then how can ordinary people be expected to be honest and not follow suit? Leaders should lead by example, rest would follow and then there would be no need for foreign intervention.
Some real points are below, and for your information Mr Humayun Akhtar Khan as well;
Take out religious education from school curriculum. Parents should be teaching their kids the fiqah/faith they want on their own via mosques/madrassa/molvis that are available in every corner of the country. State has no business imposing a particular set of religious ideas on anyone's kids but more importantly if we are one nation then there should be at least one platform where there is little or no difference and national unity is taught highlighted. Schools should and can be such platform and therefore controversial subjects like religious education should be left out for parents to teach outside of school.
Get rid of Pak Studies which is mostly lies or confusing and teaches mostly hate and narrow mindedness.
The concept of same curriculum for all institutions is just absurd. State defines a minimum standard for each grade. If an institution wants to teach more it is welcome to do so, for example, madrassas can add religious teachings to the basic state education. Parents have a choice to place their kids in whatever institution knowing that any institution will provide the minimum state standard in any case.
Recommend if you like the ideas over what Mr Humayun Akhtar Khan presented. .
I really appreciate Hamayun Akhtar Khan for this article. It is the most relevant article on the real issue of Pakistan, i have ever seen in Express Tribune. The writer pointed out to an important issue of Pakistan, three different systems of education. In my view, it created the most terrible problem for Pakistan's economy.
In our education System, we have two extremes. A and O level, and Madrassa. A and O level are so called liberals, which are earning dollars by criticizing the general public and land of Pakistan. The Madrassas students are rigid on another extremes and consider school education a sin. These two are the benefactors of USA policies against Pakistan.
However, the exploitable class is the public school students, which are moderate and have deep rooted in Pakistan. Liberals criticize this moderate class for supporting Madrassas, while Madrassas students criticize for supporting the liberals, while the top and bottom both are the beneficial of this policy, by earning dollars.
If Pakistan wants to create tolerance in general public, the solution is a uniform education system, not secularism.
It is a pleasant surprise to read such learned overview of educational problems in Pakistan, by Mr.Humayun Akhtar. While agreeing to the most of the points highlighted by learned writer I want to add that no nation in the world has achieved progress in literacy rate until and unless it adopted a language as medium of instruction spoken or understood by the majority of the population. I am confident that the introduction of English as a medium of instruction is a conspiracy against the poor masses and its only objective is to exclude poor masses from the domains of power. I am not against teaching English as language for knowing what is happening in the field of science and technology. It should be taught as a subject properly and equally to all but the medium instruction should be either mother tongue of the kid and if this is not feasible yet then at least Urdu ( desirably in roman script) should be used at least for imparting knowledge of science subjects.Many countries in the world (Indonesia,Turkey,Vietnam) have already done this and have achieved remarkable successes in the liquidation of illiteracy. I think this the only way to save our nation from drowning in the ocean of ignorance.
sounds scary..but i actually agree with mr. el-edroos.
What a generic sort of advice.
@ Humayun sahab We all know that but what your govt did in this regards or just talk which is been going on last seven decades we allways been hearing this should, would, will, could, but,...
A common curriculum is not something to aspire to, and something that many educationalists are moving away from. The best education systems, such as in Finland does not have a common curriculum and its only at the age of 17-18 that students sit one examination. The problems of a common curriculum is that the word "common". Children are all different, trying to find a one size fit all solution harkens back to industrial age education. The English medium versus Urdu divide is not a function of differing curricula but of economic divide and a lack of access to opportunities. the O and A Level systems are antiquated by every measure, and undergoing reform in the UK as we speak. In itself if is not a better form of education than any of the other alternatives. As for OSTED, well it is hardly a model, more a bureacratic nightmare, more a template for what not should be done, rather than the other way around.
All that said, at the end of the day, people are obsessed with education reform, curriculum reform, how a standard education system will somehow offer similar opportunities to everyone. That is rubbish, and an oversimplification of a complex problem. The two factors that most influence educational attainment are parental support and the quality of teachers. They are scores of schools across Pakistan, indeed the world that offer excellent facilities, a modern building, a "modern" curricula, but the students remain mediocre. That has all to do, with the quality of teachers available and how much support parents offer their children at a young age, such as helping with their homework or perhaps most importantly reading to their children. Obviously more prosperous families have the time to do so.
That is also why, students who have good teachers but come from areas or schools which most of us would consider disadvantaged turn out to do well. In Pakistan teaching is considered a proffesion that people shun, pursuing it as a last resort. Taking Finlands example, to become a teacher you have to be in the top 10% of your Masters degree class.
You can talk about unifying the curricula as much as you like, but its a step backwards. Whether in a fancy school in urban centers, a government school or a Madrassa, you can provide syllabuses but at the end of the day, it depends on what the teacher teaches, how he/she teaches it and how much support parents offer.
In Pakistan, tutoring has substituted parental support, and rather than investing in teachers we have accepted the reality that amongst the unemployed graduates we have a wide enough pool of teachers to choose from. Politicians love to talk about curriculum reform because that is something that can be delivered and measured in a short time, while investment in teaching will bear results over the long run.
This is an important epiphany that the writer seems to have had. The worst blows to the country's education system were dealt under the horrible rule of Zia-ul-Haq and his cronies.
Tomorrow is 60 years from now, if the investments are made today. Modern world history tells that clearly.