Sialkot lynching case: Lahore high court bails out condemned police chief
The court accepted Chohan’s bail application after he furnished surety bonds worth Rs100,000. Chohan and eight other policemen were awarded a three-year sentence on charges of criminal negligence which resulted in the public lynching of Mughees and Muneeb, by an ATC in Gujranwala. All the convicts had challenged the trial court’s verdict in the LHC.
Chohan submitted in his application that in light of the Supreme Court’s verdict, a convict sentenced to less than five years’ imprisonment may be released on bail. He argued that he was not present at the time of the incident and the complainant had implicated him in the case with mala fide intention. The law officer opposed his release on bail and contended that Chohan was the main culprit since the two brothers were murdered due to his negligence.
However, the court accepted Chohan’s petition and suspended his sentence. An uncle of victim Mughees and Muneeb filed an affidavit in the court submitting that he had no objection if Chohan were released on bail. He said the DPO was an honest officer and had been implicated in the case.
News cameras captured the footage of the mob battering the two brothers to death, while the police witnessed the scene. The images were replayed on various networks and caused a public outcry. The trial court had arraigned former SHO Rana Ilyas, ASI Waris and constables Tariq Mehmood, Muhammad Akram, Mubarak Ali, Muhammad Yasin, Muhammad Bashir, and Naseer Ahmed on September 19, for neglecting to intercede on the brothers’ behalf and save them from falling prey to vigilante justice.
The ATC’s judgment has raised the question whether an officer may be convicted for negligence and sentenced to prison when it was his subordinates who failed to act on time.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 4th, 2011.
COMMENTS (8)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1732745394-0/Diddy-(4)1732745394-0-165x106.webp "article")
DPO chohan and all other police officer should be punished and we have to prove it that we cannot neglect and if we allow this that some people are killing someone and police officer are just watching and there is no punishment, then every body will do this.
DPO is innocent. he was a kind person . Pakistanis should know the importance of honest and truth ful people
It was expected that the Higher Court shall set aside the lower court's order as it pressumed to be an understanding between both the courts. Since DPO seems to be main stakeholder of the incident, I am unable to understand how High Court have granted bail to the main accused? May Allah bless my homeland and save us from all the unjustice being done in my country. Ameen.
What else we can expect ?? Speechless !
DPO is the son-in-law of former DIG Rawalpindi so how he can be punished according to Pakistan Law... Judges are also live in Pakistan and always back the bureaucracy. It's responsibility of the DPO to control the policemen while they were helping the people to killing the two innocents. DPO's responsibility to protect the people of his area but what happened here. He helped the people to kill others and now released.... Shahbash Pakistani Law...
Makes me sick!
The DPO will help other convicted police officers to get bail and those police officers will help convicted criminals and so on. Thank you LHC for starting chain reaction of injustice.