TODAY’S PAPER | November 11, 2026 | EPAPER

Ban on PTI may no longer be needed after governor’s rule in K-P: Tarar

Says government may no longer need to pursue ban on PTI, accuses it of facilitating terrorism in K-P


Web Desk October 21, 2026 3 min read
Federal Information Minister Attaullah Tarar speaks in a televised message on Friday. RADIO PAKISTAN

Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said on Tuesday that a ban on the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) might no longer be necessary following the imposition of governor’s rule in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, adding that the party had already lost its government in the province due to its alleged support for terrorism.

The emergency and governor’s rule were declared on October 11 after negotiations between the government and opposition failed, culminating in a PTI long march towards Islamabad that began on October 4. Last week, a joint session of parliament adopted two separate resolutions ratifying the presidential proclamations imposing a state of emergency and governor’s rule in K-P for two months, amid protests from the opposition. Before that, both houses of parliament had separately approved the emergency in the province by majority vote under Clause 1 of Article 232 of the Constitution, despite objections from opposition lawmakers.

Speaking on a private television programme, Capital Talk, the minister said non-functional K-P Chief Minister Sohail Afridi was in protective custody. He added that an advisory council would decide whether Afridi should be arrested or whether a case should be registered against him.

Defending the decision to place Afridi in protective custody, Tarar said it was a natural step after the imposition of an emergency to take key figures into protective custody to prevent potential sabotage or threats to law and order.

Read: PHC seeks Centre’s response over imposition of emergency, governor’s rule in K-P

Criticising the PTI government’s performance in the province, he alleged that it had failed to deliver development projects and improve infrastructure.

“There is no infrastructure in Kohat. The Kohat Tunnel and motorway were built during the PML-N government, and no work has been done there since,” he said, adding that no development had taken place across the province.

“Peace is the fundamental requirement for all these things to happen. They have not even taken a stand for peace. In their view, the TTP are very good people, whom they do not want to condemn,” Tarar said.

Talking about the negotiations with the opposition, the minister said members of the PTI delegation involved in negotiations had been disappointed after Afridi rejected the terms of an agreement reached with the government while blaming the former chief minister and his associates for the collapse of the talks.

Reiterating his earlier position on banning the PTI, Tarar said a principled decision had already been taken, while a final decision would follow the completion of legal preparations. However, he said a ban might no longer be required.

“I believe there may no longer be a need for it because the PTI, as a party, is already absent from parliament. As a result of violations, it did not have an electoral symbol, and its members are not present in the House,” he said.

Lashing out at the PTI over what he described as its alleged support for the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and other militant groups, Tarar said the party had governed the province for more than 13 years.

The minister said that terrorism had been brought under control after 2017 through the complete implementation of the National Action Plan, but alleged that the PTI government had subsequently facilitated the return of militants.

Also Read: Tariq Fazal rubbishes linking governor's rule in K-P to mineral extraction

He said the party had lost its provincial government as a consequence of its alleged facilitation of terrorism, adding that there was little point in pursuing a ban under the circumstances.

The minister also praised Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman for his role in the negotiations but urged him not to politicise the issue of terrorism.

“Maulana Sahib is an experienced and astute politician. I believe it does not suit him to bring politics into the security of the province,” Tarar said, adding that the elimination of terrorism was an unequivocal objective that had to be achieved at all costs.

Acknowledging JUI-F’s sacrifices and efforts in the fight against terrorism, the minister said all political parties should unite against the menace.

“This is the time for everyone to stand together against terrorism, but terrorism and politics must be kept separate because this is a matter of the safety and security of the people,” he said.

COMMENTS (4)

Shafqat | 2 weeks ago | Reply Ban on PTI no longer be needed
Salman | 2 weeks ago | Reply This interview admits what was being denied earlier. 1. Ban on PTI may no longer be needed after governor s rule and government may no longer need to pursue ban on PTI If ban may no longer be needed because you imposed governor s rule then governor s rule was used as shortcut for ban. Ban under Article 17 needs Supreme Court to decide. Governor rule under 232 234 needs actual breakdown. You can t say we achieved same result without court so court not needed. That s bypass. And party had already lost its government in province due to alleged support for terrorism Government lost not due to court but due to presidential proclamation. That s still elected government removed by executive order not by vote. 2. Non-functional CM was in protective custody. Advisory council would decide whether Afridi should be arrested and natural step after imposition of emergency to take key figures into protective custody to prevent sabotage Protective custody is to protect person from threat not to protect government from person. If fear is sabotage law says preventive detention with grounds magistrate Article 10. And advisory council unelected no legal power cannot decide arrest. Police and court decide arrest not council. This turns emergency into detention without process. 3. PTI as party is already absent from parliament. As result of violations it did not have electoral symbol and its members are not present in House Symbol was taken by ECP in January 2024 not by voters. Voters still voted for PTI independents they won 93 National Assembly seats and 2 3 in KP. Saying absent because no symbol is like taking someone s shoes then saying he is absent from race because barefoot. 4. Development claims No infrastructure in Kohat. Kohat Tunnel and motorway were built during PML-N government and no work has been done since Kohat Tunnel was built 1999-2003 under Musharraf with Japanese aid not PML-N. Peshawar-Islamabad motorway was built in 1990s. The only motorway built by a province itself in Pakistan is Swat Motorway built by PTI KP government. So claim that no work done since PML-N is factually wrong. 5. In their view TTP are very good people whom they do not want to condemn and party facilitated return of militants after terrorism had been brought under control after 2017 through complete implementation of National Action Plan PTI condemned TTP in KP assembly resolutions and CM Afridi condemned Bannu attack on floor. Return of militants 2021-22 was federal policy negotiations in Kabul led by then DG ISI Gen Faiz approved by then federal government and NSC with directive to provinces to rehabilitate. KP was told to take them. You can t order province to rehabilitate then blame province for facilitating return. Terrorism controlled after 2017 because of Zarb-e-Azb and Radd-ul-Fasaad military operations not because NAP fully implemented. NAP points like madrasa reform and terror financing still pending federally. If governance failure over 13 years is reason solution in democracy is election not governor rule. KP people voted PTI three times. If you think they voted wrong convince them don t dismiss them.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ