TODAY’S PAPER | September 29, 2026 | EPAPER

Taking away taxman's bias

.


Editorial September 29, 2026 1 min read

The establishment of the National Faceless Centre (NFC) in Islamabad by the Federal Board of Revenue marks a significant shift in Pakistan's tax administration. By eliminating direct contact between taxpayers and tax officials, the initiative aims to curb corruption, reduce discretionary powers and enhance transparency in audit and assessment processes. The reform is also not as radical as opponents would claim - similar models have been employed for many years in countries such as the UK, Australia, and even India.

Under the new model, cases will be selected through a computerised, risk-based algorithm rather than by individual officers, and each case will pass through three separate hands - audit, assessment, and quality control. The initial focus will be on third-party data that shows visible wealth discrepancies, including air travel, luxury vehicles and lavish properties. This would help ensure that anyone facing a full audit already has some explaining to do, rather than being randomly called in. Also, given that almost all of Pakistan's ultra-rich underreport their incomes, third-party data alone will provide enough data to keep the FBR busy for several months.

However, legitimate concerns remain. The Finance Bill 2026 provides that NFC orders cannot be challenged on jurisdictional grounds alone. In effect, this means that the faceless adjudicators may well be shielded from procedural accountability. Smaller taxpayers with limited legal capacity may also face pressure to accept algorithmic settlement offers without meaningful paths to appeal. In a positive development, the National Assembly Standing Committee has flagged the need for safeguards against algorithmic manipulation, data tampering and privacy breaches. Hopefully, legislation and competent leadership will ensure that the tax authority does not fall victim to the impunity of its own officers, and citizens can begin to see tax season as a minor inconvenience, rather than a horror story.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ