TODAY’S PAPER | September 16, 2026 | EPAPER

Rs100 trillion in debt: should Pakistan be worried?

Real challenge is country's capacity to carry and service debt sustainably; signs emerging direction may finally be c


DR MANZOOR AHMAD August 24, 2026 3 min read
SLOW PACE: The government’s external debt rose from Rs23.4 trillion to Rs24.2 trillion – a jump of Rs783 billion – which was lower than previous trends due to the appreciation of the rupee against the US dollar in the last fiscal year. PHOTO:FILE

ISLAMABAD:

The headlines are alarming: Pakistan's debt has crossed Rs100 trillion. The figure has been splashed across social media and reported prominently in the national press. The number is indeed enormous. But, by itself, it tells us very little about whether the country's debt position is becoming more dangerous or more manageable.

The important questions are: Is debt growing faster or slower? Is it rising relative to the size of the economy? How much of it is in foreign currency? How much government revenue is being consumed by interest payments? What is the maturity profile? How much debt has to be rolled over in the near future? And does the country have sufficient foreign exchange reserves to meet its external obligations?

Viewed through these lenses, Pakistan's recent debt story is considerably more nuanced than the Rs100 trillion headline suggests. The direction matters.

The first encouraging development is the rate at which debt is accumulating. According to government figures, debt growth in FY26 was around 7.7%, reportedly the lowest rate in two decades, compared with an average of about 16% in previous years. This suggests that the trajectory has shifted from rapid accumulation towards greater containment.

The second important indicator is the debt-to-GDP ratio. Pakistan's debt-to-GDP ratio has reportedly fallen to around 68% from the exceptionally high 88% range recorded five years ago. This is a significant change. The absolute stock of debt may continue to rise in rupee terms while the burden of that debt relative to the size of the economy falls.

Another important indicator is debt servicing. Here too, there has been an improvement. Annual interest expenditure has reportedly fallen from around Rs8.9 trillion to Rs6.9 trillion, while interest payments as a share of total government revenue have fallen from about 61% in FY24 to 35% in FY26. Put simply, Rs61 out of every Rs100 of revenue that previously went to interest has fallen to around Rs35.

Debt cannot be assessed independently of foreign exchange reserves. State Bank reserves have risen from around $3 billion three and a half years ago to $18.5 billion, increasing import cover from barely 2.4 weeks to roughly three months. While this remains below the comfortable level, the substantially rebuilt reserve buffer has significantly strengthened Pakistan's ability to meet external obligations.

The composition and maturity of debt are as important as its size. Pakistan has reportedly retired around Rs4.72 trillion of debt before maturity. At the same time, the average maturity of domestic debt has increased from roughly 2.8 years to more than 3.8 years. Longer maturities reduce the risk of having to refinance very large amounts of debt every year.

Perhaps the biggest historical risk has been the external debt since it has to be serviced in foreign currency. This too has improved as the external debt's share of public debt has fallen from about 38% six years ago to 31%. Still, vulnerability remains because about one-quarter comes from bilateral creditors that require frequent rollover.

Another overlooked indicator is market confidence. Pakistan has returned to international capital markets after a four-year absence, including through Eurobond and Panda Bond issuances. Credit-rating agencies have also upgraded Pakistan, with S&P's latest upgrade to 'B', its highest level in almost a decade. Yet Pakistan remains below investment grade and needs further progress to achieve investment-grade status and access international markets on more favourable terms.

The challenge now is to ensure that these improvements are not temporary. We need to reach a point where debt no longer crowds out development, where interest payments no longer consume revenues needed for education and infrastructure, and where economic growth itself steadily reduces the burden of past borrowing.

The Rs100 trillion figure makes a dramatic headline. But the real measure of Pakistan's debt problem is not the size of the debt alone. It is the country's capacity to carry and service that debt sustainably. And, for the first time in many years, there are signs that the direction may finally be changing.

The writer is a Senior Fellow, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics. Previously, he has served as Pakistan's ambassador and permanent representative to the World Trade Organisation

COMMENTS (3)

Rebirth | 3 weeks ago | Reply Had any of us been smart we would ve known that inflation reduces the country s GDP relative to the dollar because of the exchange rate and increases the foreign-denominated debt for the same reason. This means that the current GDP is artificially suppressed and the debt is artificially higher and it also means we re accumulating a higher amount of debt every year because of this inflated currency. Yet on all 3 counts the economy is beyond stable but of course it s not a very industrialized economy and that s because of the PPP political terrorists sabotaging our industrial and financial base in Karachi. And growth is not curbed because of imports reduction. This would make sense if Pakistan was like the US but we re not an imports-based consumer economy but rather an economy moving towards indigenization which extends to assembly of goods even if we re not manufacturing every single component for every good. The 35 ratio presented by the genius author is linked to the geniuses in the finance ministry and their reporting. The numbers used are the net interest divided by the total federal revenue minus provincial disbursements. It does not reflect total revenue which is 29 trillion and the gross interest is 8 trillion. This brings the interest payments down to less than 30 or close to 28 . The reason this number is so high is because of double digit policy rates by Raja Dahir s demonic priest who is our SBP governor. You have to watch the Knight and the Princess to understand that reference which the PPP political terrorists don t want us to watch even though the entire country including they benefit from the bin Qasim port and their apparent constituents live in Qasimabad not Latifabad. All the suggestions make no sense particularly the MSCI related recommendations since MSCI is not free from geopolitical risks. We can operate our markets independently and shamelessly just as the US markets keep growing fuelled by AI growth. It requires some serious shamelessness to pull off this scam. Being a nation of inbred retards slightly more than the Indians since they don t marry their cousins which we can t either Islamically but our people do anyway we might not be very good at scams. But we can do a lot better than what we re doing now. And the crowding out of capital is a consequence of Raja Dahir s demonic priest s policy rate decisions. The commercial banks will not invest or rather hand out capital to the people at double digit rates because there s no business on the planet including illegal businesses that can surpass double digit profit margins to meet that kind of interest payments which would definitely surpass KIBOR by 2-3 when handed to average industries. The double digit rates is why the remaining problems that you ve highlighted are not resolved but that s just one MPC meeting away. Let s see if the demonic priest makes a positive decision or he chooses to act as he looks. We obviously don t want to go against the FSC s decision on interest for banking and business but the entire double digit interest rate business is nothing short of criminal. We re doing amazing on the fiscal side even though the government is average at best. It s the monetary policy that s brought us to the still very high interest-revenue ratio.
Salman | 3 weeks ago | Reply Much of this stabilization has been achieved through import compression elevated inflation which artificially inflates nominal GDP and shrinks the debt ratio and heavy taxation to maintain IMF-mandated primary surpluses. Reducing debt intensity by curbing growth and domestic demand is unsustainable once import restrictions ease to spur economic activity debt dynamics risk accelerating again. The author concedes but underplays that a quarter of external obligations remains dependent on constant bilateral rollovers e.g. from China Saudi Arabia and the UAE . Dependence on political goodwill for debt extensions is not structural solvency it leaves the economy vulnerable to geopolitical shifts. Even at 35 of federal revenue interest expenditure remains the single largest budget item leaving minimal fiscal space for capital investment infrastructure or human development. Furthermore because domestic banks primarily fund government debt commercial credit to the private sector remains heavily crowded out stifling long-term industrial productivity. A B rating remains well below investment grade. Accessing international capital markets at frontier-market yield levels locks the sovereign into expensive high-interest foreign currency debt. Relying on market access while underlying structural reforms such as widening the tax base or restructuring state-owned enterprises remain incomplete exposes the balance sheet to future external shocks.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ