Isla Fisher accused of white privilege for apolitical Instagram stance

Isla Fisher is facing criticism online after updating her Instagram bio to say ‘no politics pls’

Isla Fisher is drawing criticism online after she updated her Instagram bio with the phrase “no politics pls,” a decision that has sparked debate about celebrity silence on social issues and the role of public figures in political discourse. Critics interpreted the apolitical stance as a sign of privilege, arguing that choosing not to engage with politics from a position of comfort ignores broader societal problems.

The controversy gained attention after fans and commentators noticed the new bio, which simply asks followers to avoid political topics. Many online reacted by saying the message felt tone deaf at a time marked by intense political debate. Commenters suggested that opting out of politics can be a form of escapism that reflects an inability or unwillingness to confront systemic issues that affect less privileged groups.

A common critique pointed to what some described as “white privilege,” meaning that someone with celebrity status and social influence might avoid political engagement because they and those in their circle are less likely to face direct harm from political decisions. In this view, critics argued that taking a public platform and declaring “no politics” can look like a refusal to acknowledge or use influence on important issues, rather than a neutral personal preference.

In addition to general apathy criticisms, some online voices tied Fisher’s stance to her personal associations and the choices of people in her social orbit, suggesting that these relationships might inform her reluctance to address politics publicly. Others mocked the phrase itself, comparing it to dismissive attitudes toward deeply felt concerns that many people experience in their daily lives.

Supporters of an apolitical approach responded by saying that individuals have a right to set boundaries around political discussion on their personal pages, arguing that not everyone wants entertainment spaces to become battlegrounds for divisive issues. They maintained that choosing not to spotlight politics does not necessarily indicate ignorance or endorsement of problematic systems.