An international team of scientists said on Thursday they had recorded sub-atomic particles travelling faster than light – a finding that could overturn one of Einstein’s long-accepted fundamental laws of the universe.
Antonio Ereditato, spokesman for the researchers, told Reuters that measurements taken over three years showed neutrinos pumped from CERN near Geneva to Gran Sasso in Italy had arrived 60 nanoseconds quicker than light would have done. “We have high confidence in our results. We have checked and rechecked for anything that could have distorted our measurements but we found nothing,” he said. “We now want colleagues to check them independently.”
If confirmed, the discovery would undermine Albert Einstein’s 1905 theory of special relativity, which says that the speed of light is a “cosmic constant” and that nothing in the universe can travel faster.
That assertion, which has withstood over a century of testing, is one of the key elements of the so-called Standard Model of physics, which attempts to describe the way the universe and everything in it works.
The totally unexpected finding emerged from research by a physicists working on an experiment dubbed OPERA run jointly by the CERN particle research centre near Geneva and the Gran Sasso Laboratory in central Italy.
A total of 15,000 beams of neutrinos – tiny particles that pervade the cosmos – were fired over a period of 3 years from CERN towards Gran Sasso 730 km away, where they were picked up by giant detectors. Light would have covered the distance in around 2.4 thousandths of a second, but the neutrinos took 60 nanoseconds – or 60 billionths of a second – less than light beams would have taken.
“It is a tiny difference,” said Ereditato, who also works at Berne University in Switzerland, “but conceptually it is incredibly important. The finding is so startling that, for the moment, everybody should be very prudent.”
Ereditato declined to speculate on what it might mean if other physicists, who will be officially informed of the discovery at a meeting in CERN on Friday, found that OPERA’s measurements were correct.
“I just don’t want to think of the implications,” he told Reuters. “We are scientists and work with what we know.”
Much science-fiction literature is based on the idea that, if the light-speed barrier can be overcome, time travel might theoretically become possible.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 23rd, 2011.
COMMENTS (30)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
i know how a collective of small unconnected masses that operate in unison..can influence the behaviour of many other disconnected small masses..i know how the dominating force becomes larger....im not telling untill i see dollars.
@hassan: don't care, can see many like these in many religions, not interested in religious discussion,
@John B: Lorentz oscillation violation and neutrinos - they have already been mentioned in Qu'ran and the western scientists are discovering it only now !!
@arslan khan: @Mark Twirtschaftzer: man, more researches have to be done on these issues, it was also seen that even galaxies of very far distances travel faster than light, but which were successfully explained with the help of hubblel's law and hubble constant H.
Does any one knows how much time (approx) the prophet took to travel from world to the SIdra-tul-muntaha. I think this would define the maximum speed defined by lord for this universe.
I also heard that cosmologist/ astro scientists claim that there is some time gap in this universe. I dont know whether this is true or not. But if it is true, then can some one tell me the details(and sources to read)
@Eric: you should combine length contraction, time expansion, mass, energy, space etc simultaneously, which is strange from our Newtonian experience.
Einstien is not final to say Satarow se agay jahan aur bi hai.
@Eric: a very huge amount of energy is required to attain that speed, and that energy is converted to mass, at the same time that object shrinks in its moving direction and also time expands, ie at the speed of light, mass of that particle is infinite, size along its moving direction is zero, and no time variation- that means there will not be that particle and mass is infinite (assumption) which is impossible., ie only massless (as a form of energy) can travel @ that velocity, and your case for subatomic particles should come at velocities of >99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999...........% of C and these particles never exceed at that speed. waiting for more about this
"At the speed of light, mass reaches infinity" "time comes to a standstill"
Seems as though this near infinite mass' edges would touch much of space and in some manner we could focus on and direct that mass to that area of space we wished to travel.
Getting wayyy out there, there are numerous reports of extra-terrestial machines described as displaying behavior within our ideas regarding other dimensions. If someone out there is moving dimensionally then this could be considered outside of the realm of our thoughts regarding the speed of light.
To those who might have seen this phenomena (as I have) I believe it is opening up a whole new field of thought and research. If the government, as many believe, is aware of these aspects of time and position (as claimed by David Adair, intellectual extraordinary) then we are already on a new path of discovery.
Our government is NOT on the up and up...defense, offense and destruction is their focus.
@Eric
At the speed of light, mass reaches infinity, and infinite energy is required to propel the mass. And time comes to standstill, just like in a black hole. So its not possible. The matter would cease to exist
@Mark Twirtschaftzer: link, or it never happened.
@arslan khan: Lorentz oscillation violation- has it been proved experimentally ? @Eric: Now we are going somewhere, assuming their statistics is correct. Mass has to be accounted for. The velocity of subatomic particle with mass traveling at (or above)the speed of light brings its own conundrum.
@ Moise True
I have for some time wondered whether objects with mass might not arrive at a destination in a shorter period than light does because of the effect mass has on space. In other words, although the object never actually exceeds light speed, the increasing mass as the object's velocity increases bends space and shortens the distance the object has to travel...the result would be faster-than-light travel without actually exceeding the speed of light!
Hpw far away we are now from travelling into times while the light-speed barrier is over now??
but what about the subatomic particles? where they come from? what about plank's quantum theory??????
Yes, Ideally, speed of light should be constant That is what was know before einstein And that was the postulate he base his theory of relativity And he also concluded no matter can reach the speed of light
When a matter reaches the speed of light, it becomes quantoms of energy to the observer ie no speed exists beyond C
Now see the headline. Scientists have discovered/ experimented with particles moving at speed higher than C. ie particles moving at speed higher than 'speed of light in space'
So this experiment seriously brings Einstien theory into controversy
Infact, his theory of relativity had always remained in controversy (in the scientific circles) Some had even questioned his mathematical derivations of time&space dilation. For that yu have to read his research paper written in german and translated later in english. both versions available on net. Infact Lorentz equations solved by Lorentz before Einstein depicts time and space dilation solution.
SECRET NEWS
Subatomic particles traveled at 60 billionth of a second less than the light. However, Russian Teslas can travel at 1000th of a second less than the light.
Which is an incredible discovery/
How did you like my news?
Why have two kinds of energy; one that can travel in speed of light and it is the electromagnetic waves and another that travels in speed that is always below the speed of light and it is the mass?
@Deepak
The speed of light is constant regardless of the frame of reference we are in. If you move at 0.9 C, opposite to a beam of light and calculate the speed of light. The answer would be same i.e. C. Its due to time dilation that speed of light remains constant
Tesla was right.
I had read a similar report back in 2004 that Australian scientist had proved speed more than speed of light can exist. Now it is european scientists.
With regard to comments of Deepak, i think he has to review his concepts.
You have to remember that Einstein's ideas are now 105 years old. He may have pointed us in the right directions but his theories are slowly being broken down into quaint, but incomplete.
Quantum thought is suffering also. The answers are out there and we are making progress but neither Einstein nor contemporary research seem to contain much of a future.
We have missed something along the way.
The speed of light is definitely a cosmic contant as it is not varying in either time frames or through the space. This was what Einstein thought about when he introduced c. But the most misinterpretted part of the relativity is that everyone considers that the speed of light is the ultimate speed that a particle can obtain. But in fact its basically a reference from with respect to which a particle can't move with such speeds. which means if we are in a particular frame which is in motion and is our reference frame then a particle in a frame we are observing can't have speeds greater than that of light but it doesn't tell that the speed of the particle cannot have such speeds in the reference frame itself. I am not a highly qualified person to argue about other's opinions but this is my opinion and the way i understand it. So when it is practically observed that some particles can have speeds exceeding the c it doesn't mean that c is not a constant and we have to change the entire concept of relativity. It still is valid but the only thing is that we need to look at it in a different manner and what Einstein meant in his relativity theories.
So what about the mass energy convertibility?
Suppose we don’t take into account the Maxwell equations and the Michelson Morley experiment. Is there any philosophic scientific consideration that must be limit to the speed of energy that move from one place to another place?
@John Breaking the speed of time. Mind you, the speed of light already sort of does that
Now that we've broke the record of light speed, what's next?