Aligning for Gaza

For decades, the Muslim world has been criticised for its fractured response to the Palestinian question. Capitals issued statements, but seldom in unison. Policies diverged and priorities differed, diluting collective strength. But the events of the past week mark a rare moment when Muslim and Arab countries are not only aligned but are pushing back — firmly and publicly — against Israel's attempts to engineer demographic change in Gaza under the guise of "humanitarian passage".

The joint statement issued by major Muslims states last Friday is one of the strongest collective rebukes in recent memory. The "absolute rejection" of any displacement of Palestinians has drawn a clear red line that Gaza's population will not be scattered to ease Israel's political calculus. Egypt's refusal to cooperate for taking in those refugees was an unmistakable signal that it would not play the role of a buffer state for Israel's political ambitions. Cairo's position also matters, as Rafah is Gaza's only lifeline not directly controlled by Israel. Keeping it shut to prevent demographic manipulation has become a core component of regional diplomacy.

Pakistan's own diplomacy has been unambiguous. Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar labelled Israel's restriction of Rafah as a "clear violation" of the peace plan. His conversation with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan further aligned both countries on ensuring "unfettered aid" and coordinated action. This is how influence is built. But the broader context is equally telling. Negotiations on the next phase of the ceasefire remain stalled. The Trump plan contains ambiguities that both sides are attempting to weaponise. Yet Muslim states are now moving early to fill those grey zones with unified demands rather than competing agendas.

For once, Muslim nations are using their collective weight not just to condemn, but to constrain. And that, more than any communique, is what could turn this fragile ceasefire into the foundation of an actual political settlement.