‘Case No. 9’ removes line about 26th Amendment from its YouTube video

Episode 17 of the drama featured a courtroom scene referencing the 26th Amendment and Justice Mansoor Ali Shah

A recent episode of Geo Entertainment’s Case No. 9 has prompted discussion online after viewers noticed that a significant courtroom exchange aired on television was missing from the drama’s official YouTube upload.

The episode in question, which went out on Wednesday night, featured Aaminah Sheikh’s character, Beenish, delivering a rebuttal in court while defending Seher, played by Saba Qamar. During cross-examination, Faysal Quraishi’s character attempts to cast doubt on Seher’s credibility by referring to her as a divorced woman and “not a virgin.” Beenish responds by citing landmark judgments by Justice Ayesha Malik and Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, arguing that a woman’s past relationships have no bearing on her character or on a rape case, a sentiment noted in Justice Malik’s own rulings.

It was Beenish’s introduction to Justice Shah’s judgment that drew attention. In the original broadcast, she states, Had the 26th Constitutional Amendment not been passed, blocking his way, he would have been our country’s chief justice.” The opposing counsel counters by quoting Mirza Ghalib and asserting parliament’s supremacy: “Parliament is the country’s supreme institution and it has passed the 26th Amendment.

By the next morning, this exchange, visible in the TV telecast, had been removed from the episode uploaded to YouTube. Writer of the drama and journalist Shahzeb Khanzada later shared the unedited clip on X, confirming that the omission was not part of the original broadcast.

Load Next Story