
England return to World Cup qualifying action this week with Thomas Tuchel under pressure to solve a plethora of issues that threaten to ruin his bid to win next year's tournament.
Tuchel has made an underwhelming start to his reign and the German must use qualifiers against Andorra and Serbia to resolve the problems that marred his first four games.
AFP Sport looks at the most pressing topics ahead of Saturday's clash with Andorra at Villa Park:
Lift the gloom
England sit top of Group K with three wins from three games, six goals scored and none conceded -- but appearances can be deceptive.
Tuchel's side laboured to a 2-0 win against Albania in his first match in March and needed two second-half goals to put a flattering gloss on a 3-0 victory over Latvia.
The sight of England labouring to a 1-0 win over minnows Andorra in June was alarming for Tuchel, but there was even worse to come as the Three Lions finished their summer schedule with a dismal 3-1 defeat against Senegal in a friendly in Nottingham.
England's first loss to an African side provoked a scathing response from angry fans frustrated by the team's lethargic display.
It was a far cry from Tuchel's bold claim that he wanted his team to play an attacking style that would cast off the caution showed by his predecessor Gareth Southgate.
There is little doubt England will make the tournament in the United States, Mexico and Canada, but ending their 60-year wait for a major trophy is the true test of Tuchel's mettle.
The former Chelsea and Bayern Munich boss needs to restore faith by masterminding a comprehensive victory in the Andorra rematch before a tricky trip to face Serbia in Belgrade on Tuesday.
An England win over Serbia -- their only rival for top spot in Group K -- would serve as a significant statement of intent on the road to the World Cup.
Build a cohesive midfield
Tuchel has called up 13 different midfielders in his three squads, underlining his struggle to establish a cohesive unit in the engine room.
The England boss has asked Declan Rice to play in the more advanced central midfield position he has excelled in for Arsenal.
That leaves a spot for a more defensive midfielder, which Jordan Henderson filled against Andorra in June.
Yet, aged 35, Henderson hardly looks the ideal solution, despite Tuchel's regard for the Brentford veteran's leadership qualities.
Jude Bellingham's injury absence is a blow, although it allows Tuchel to move on from his controversial claim that his mother finds the Real Madrid star's on-pitch behaviour "repulsive".
That faux pas forced the German into a grovelling apology and raised serious questions about his man-management.
Without Bellingham, Tuchel could turn to Nottingham Forest's uncapped Elliot Anderson or AC Milan's Ruben Loftus-Cheek, who features for the first time in nearly seven years and thrived under the German at Chelsea.
Create chances for Kane
England's sluggish play in the final third has been a recurring problem for Tuchel and injuries to Bukayo Saka and Cole Palmer have added to the issue.
England look no more dynamic than they did under Southgate and perceptions of Tuchel's tactics are already beginning to skew towards the sceptical.
Creating enough chances for captain Harry Kane -- England's record goalscorer -- must be the primary aim before the World Cup.
He will choose from Marcus Rashford, Eberechi Eze, Anthony Gordon, Noni Madueke and Jarrod Bowen to provide the supply lines against Andorra and Serbia.
Settle on full-backs
Using Liverpool midfielder Curtis Jones at right-back and Chelsea right-back Reece James at left-back in the June qualifier against Andorra showed that Tuchel is still scrambling for solutions in England's defence.
Clarity remains elusive as Tuchel surprisingly dropped Real Madrid right-back Trent Alexander-Arnold from the current squad and gave a maiden call-up to Tottenham's Djed Spence.
James was retained and will compete with Spence, Tino Livramento and Myles Lewis-Skelly for the right and left-back roles.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ