A return to one of cinema's most enduring sci-fi horror franchises has sparked fierce debate among fans and critics alike.
Alien: Earth, the latest entry in the four-decade-old saga, premiered this week to a mixture of glowing praise and scathing condemnation. Set in the year 2120, the film shifts the action from deep space to Earth for the first time.
When a mysterious alien vessel crashes into a densely populated city, a young womanher consciousness transferred into a synthetic bodyjoins an unlikely team of "child-minded" synthetics and combat troops to investigate.
Their mission reveals a collection of hostile alien lifeforms capable of threatening the entire planet, forcing humanity into a desperate fight for survival.
Show Creator Noah Hawley delivers a high-budget production steeped in visual homage to Ridley Scott's 1979 original.
Several reviewers lauded the meticulous set design, atmospheric lighting, and practical effects, noting the film "looks every bit the prestige sci-fi blockbuster." Fans also praised the expanded world-building, with its corporate dystopia, synthetic rights debates, and new alien variants.
However, much of the commentary has been far less forgiving. Longtime franchise followers accuse the film of straying too far from the claustrophobic tension and grounded logic of its predecessors.
"It looks beautiful, but characters make baffling choices and tension is sacrificed for spectacle," one online reviewer wrote. Others took aim at what they saw as a diluted horror element and a storyline leaning towards teenage adventure over adult dread.
Industry critics remain equally split. Some hail it as an "instant sci-fi classic" and the boldest shake-up to the series since Aliens (1986), while detractors brand it "franchise-wrecking" and "a flashy betrayal of the Alien legacy."
With studio executives already hinting at a potential sequel, the series' polarising reception may prove as much a talking point as its on-screen horrors.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ