Govt comes under attack in NA for ignoring agri sector

Rana Hayat proposed the creation of a special House committee to focus on the problems faced by farmers


Our Correspondent June 20, 2025
PML-N-led coalition government in the Centre now has 229 members in the NA. PHOTO: APP

print-news
ISLAMABAD:

Lawmakers from the treasury and opposition benches on Thursday welcomed improved economic indicators and emphasized the need for bipartisan efforts to sustain economic progress and promote inclusive growth.

Resuming the budget debate, Raja Qamar-ul-Islam of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) praised the budget as historic and lauded the role of Pakistan's armed forces in sending a firm message to India. He expressed confidence that the budget 2025-26 would pave the way for sustainable economic growth in the country.

Amir Dogar of the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC) criticized the government for overlooking the agriculture sector and called for raising the minimum wage to Rs 50,000.

Atif Khan of SIC criticized the budget and stressed relief measures for the poor segment of society.

Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians (PPPP) legislator Shagufta Jumani appreciated the government for allocating significant funds to the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP).

She also urged the government to allocate dedicated funds for polio eradication, emphasizing the importance of sustained public health efforts.

Rana Hayat proposed the creation of a special House committee to focus on the problems faced by farmers, a vital segment of the economy.

MNA Usama Ahmed Mela, emphasizing the critical role of agriculture in national development, called on the government to provide incentives for farmers, including subsidies for fertilizer, pesticide and broader agricultural reforms.

He also suggested a review of the Federal Board of Revenue's (FBR) authority, indicating concerns about its administrative reach.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ