Transformative potential of CPEC and Gwadar

Listen to article

CPEC is not about a few scattered projects or an array of initiatives aligned more with Chinese interest rather than benefiting Pakistan. Neither is CPEC about the debt circle that China has been accused of using to snarl less developed countries to enhance its clout in the region. CPEC is about an investment environment built to align Pakistan with the eco-system of developing nations. CPEC is about the promise of better business conditions to improve Pakistan's manufacturing sector. CPEC is about hope to elevating living standard of millions of people of South Asia, specially. In the 10-year journey, CPEC has assisted Pakistan in providing electricity to millions of households and businesses. Similarly, CPEC has been a game-changer in building network of roads and railway tracks in Pakistan.

This is just a part of the story. At the heart of it lies the Gwadar port with the potential to transform the region and uplift Balochistan, which has long suffered from underdevelopment. It would create thousands of jobs, improve access to education and healthcare and stimulate local economies. While challenges remain, the long-term benefits of CPEC for Pakistan and the region are undeniable.

Despite its transformative potential, CPEC has been the target of misinformation campaigns aimed at undermining its progress. False narratives and exaggerated claims have been used to sow discord and create mistrust between China and Pakistan, as well as between the Pakistani government and local communities. These campaigns often ignore the broader context and long-term vision of CPEC, focusing instead on isolated incidents and challenges.

One such example is a recent article published in The Guardian titled "What went wrong with 'Pakistan's Dubai'? - Inside the Chinese initiative that is prompting terror attacks". While the article raises some valid concerns, it presents a skewed and incomplete picture of CPEC and Gwadar. For instance, it highlights local dissatisfaction in Gwadar but fails to acknowledge the efforts being made to address these concerns. It also speculates about China's military intentions, ignoring the transparent and mutually beneficial nature of the China-Pakistan partnership.

It is true that CPEC faces security challenges, particularly in Balochistan, where extremist groups like the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) have targeted Chinese workers and infrastructure. However, these attacks are not a reflection of CPEC's failure but rather an attempt by extremist elements to derail progress and maintain their grip on the region. The BLA's violent campaign is driven by a desire to exploit local grievances for their own agenda, not by genuine concern for the people of Balochistan.

China and Pakistan have both invested heavily in securing CPEC projects, and their collaboration on intelligence sharing and counterterrorism is a positive step toward ensuring the safety of workers and infrastructure. While the security situation remains challenging, it is improving, and the commitment of both nations to overcoming these obstacles is unwavering.

Contrary to the speculative claims, China's involvement in CPEC is driven by economic, not military, motives. The deepwater port and airport in Gwadar are commercial assets designed to boost trade and investment, not military installations. Chinese officials have repeatedly emphasised their commitment to peaceful development and mutual benefit, and there is no evidence to support the claim that China is seeking to establish a military presence in Pakistan.

The suggestion that China is pressuring Pakistan to allow the presence of PLA troops is baseless and undermines the trust and cooperation that underpin the China-Pakistan relationship. Both nations have denied any such plans, and it is crucial to take their statements at face value rather than indulging in speculative narratives.

The negative portrayal of CPEC in some media outlets reflects a broader geopolitical bias rather than an objective assessment of the project. CPEC is not a zero-sum game; it is a win-win initiative that benefits not only China and Pakistan but also the wider region. By improving infrastructure and connectivity, CPEC has the potential to spur economic growth across South Asia and beyond.

The concerns raised by countries like the US and India about CPEC stem from their own strategic interests, not from a genuine concern for Pakistan's development. It is important to recognise that Pakistan has the right to pursue partnerships that align with its national interests, and CPEC is a cornerstone of its economic and strategic vision.

While challenges remain, CPEC is far from a failure. It is a work in progress that requires patience, collaboration and a long-term perspective. Both China and Pakistan are committed to addressing the issues raised, whether they relate to security, local grievances or economic viability. The success of CPEC will depend on the ability of both nations to adapt to changing circumstances and ensure that the benefits of the project are shared equitably.

The misinformation campaigns, such as the one exemplified by The Guardian article, seek to undermine this vision. By staying focused on the long-term goals and addressing challenges with determination, China and Pakistan can ensure that CPEC fulfills its promise as a catalyst for development and progress.