It’s Angus Neill, not Cillian Murphy, as zombie in ‘28 Years Later’

Angus Neill debuts as a zombie in Danny Boyle’s ‘28 Years Later,’ ending speculation about Cillian Murphy.


Pop Culture & Art December 12, 2024

The trailer for Danny Boyle’s 28 Years Later has sparked speculation among fans, with many convinced that Cillian Murphy was making a return as a zombie. A scene featuring an emaciated undead figure rising behind Jodie Comer fueled rumors that the actor was reprising his role. Fans on social media celebrated what they thought was Murphy’s eerie cameo, with some calling it “perfect” for the franchise, according to The Guardian.

However, The Guardian confirmed that the role of “Emaciated Infected” is played by newcomer Angus Neill, not Murphy. Neill, an art dealer and model known for his distinctive appearance, was personally selected by Boyle for the part. “Danny told me he’d always had me in mind for the role,” Neill shared with The Guardian. He described working with Boyle as an intense and hypnotic experience, calling it a highlight of his acting debut.

Murphy, who starred in the original 2002 film 28 Days Later, played a bicycle courier who wakes from a coma to find society overrun by a deadly virus. While his character survived, Murphy did not appear in the 2007 sequel, 28 Weeks Later. He has, however, expressed eagerness to reunite with Boyle and writer Alex Garland, though his involvement in the upcoming film has not been confirmed.

Alongside Neill and Comer, 28 Years Later features Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Ralph Fiennes, and Jack O’Connell. Scheduled for release in June 2025, the film builds on the legacy of the genre-defining 28 Days Later. Fans eagerly anticipate how Boyle’s vision will expand the franchise.

The confirmation of Neill’s casting refocuses attention on the fresh cast and creative direction of this third installment, as reported by The Guardian. Sony Pictures has yet to provide additional comment.

 

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ