Sindh's tax collection surpasses all provinces despite lower rates

Target for previous financial year was set at Rs235 billion, but province managed to collect Rs237 billion


Saleem Jhandir October 12, 2024 1 min read

KARACHI:

Sindh's tax collection has outperformed all provinces this year, according to the Sindh Revenue Board (SRB), despite a lower tax rate.

Chairman of the Sindh Revenue Board, Wasif Memon, revealed that the target for the previous financial year was set at Rs235 billion, but the province managed to collect Rs237 billion.

He added that for the current financial year, a target of Rs350 billion has been set.

In an exclusive interview with Express News on Saturday, Memon noted that tax collection from the restaurant sector has been increasing, particularly after the implementation of the Point of Sale (POS) system, which has seen tax collection rise from Rs20 million to Rs80 million.

He explained that an eight per cent tax is applied to card payments, while a 15 per cent tax is levied on cash payments.

Some restaurant owners have expressed their objection to the higher cash payment tax, insisting they would only charge 15 per cent.

Memon emphasised that technology is being utilised to combat tax evasion.

He also mentioned that this financial year, intra-city goods transporters have been included in the tax net, as well as educational institutions and hospitals, which is expected to further boost the province’s revenue.

COMMENTS (3)

Tahmina Mahfooz | 8 months ago | Reply It s need to be high light for the citizens of Sindh especially Karachi. The more it earn the less it gets.
kashif | 8 months ago | Reply many restaurants like bbq tonight macdonalds kfc optp are still charging higher tax despite reduced rate introduction by Govt of Sindh. govt of sindh on one hand introduced reduced rate of tax on card payments and also allowed many restaurants have been allowed to higher tax rate.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ