IEA sees slow growth in oil demand

China’s share in demand gains will fall to 40% from 70% last year


REUTERS July 12, 2024

print-news
LONDON:

Global oil demand growth will slow to just under a million barrels per day (bpd) this year and next, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said, as Chinese consumption contracted in the second quarter due to economic problems.

Global demand in the second quarter rose by 710,000 bpd year on year in its lowest quarterly increase in over a year, the IEA, which advises industrialised countries, said in its monthly oil report. “China’s pre-eminence (is) fading. Last year, the country accounted for 70% of global demand gains – this will decline to around 40% in 2024 and 2025,” the IEA said.

Oil forecasters are split more widely than usual on the strength of oil demand growth for this year and the medium term, partly due to differences over the pace of the world’s transition to cleaner fuels. On Wednesday, producer group Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) maintained its much higher forecasts.

The IEA left its forecast for relatively low oil demand growth of 970,000 bpd this year largely unchanged from its outlook last month, and trimmed its growth forecast for next year by 50,000 bpd to 980,000.

By contrast, OPEC expects oil demand to rise by 2.25 million bpd this year, more than double the IEA’s prediction, with China providing a significant chunk of the growth. As the post-Covid economic rebound flattens out worldwide, the IEA added, lacklustre economic growth, increased energy efficiency and the rise of electric vehicles will act as headwinds for growth this year and next.

At the same time, the IEA said, oil supply growth this year would hit 770,000 bpd, boosting total supply to a record 103 million bpd. That growth is set to more than double next year to reach 1.8 million bpd, with the United States, Canada, Guyana and Brazil leading gains.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ