UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres wants to see the situation of former prime minister Imran Khan "evolve in a much more positive way," according to his spokesperson.
When asked if the UN chief supports a recommendation by the UN Group on Arbitrary Detention to release the incarcerated PTI founder, Guterres’ spokesperson Stephane Dujarric acknowledged the independent panel's recommendation during a press briefing on Tuesday.
"We want to see the current political situation, the current situation of Mr Khan, evolve in a much more positive way," Dujarric stated.
The UN human rights working group has labelled Khan's detention as arbitrary and a violation of international law, urging for his immediate release.
In response, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar asserted that Khan's arrest and ongoing legal cases are strictly domestic matters.
"Pakistan is a sovereign state where constitutional and legal matters are upheld through the judiciary," Tarar emphasised. He confirmed that Khan is serving his sentence as a lawfully convicted individual, entitled to all rights under national laws and international norms.
Also read: Govt calls Imran Khan's arrest Pakistan’s ‘internal affair’ despite UN criticism
Tarar further highlighted that relief granted to the PTI founder in various cases reflects Pakistan's commitment to transparent and impartial trials, adhering to constitutional principles, laws, and international standards.
The US State Department has also commented, stating that Khan's detention is an internal matter for Pakistan.
This statement was part of a broader discussion during a recent press briefing where Vedant Patel, Principal Deputy Spokesperson of the State Department, addressed various concerns involving Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Patel referred to the UN's declaration on Khan's detention and deferred to the UN for further clarification, adding that the US had no additional assessment to offer.
COMMENTS (1)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ