Pakistan, India exchange lists of prisoners

This exchange, occurring simultaneously in Islamabad and New Delhi, follows the Consular Access Agreement of 2008


News Desk July 01, 2024
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Islamabad. PHOTO: FILE

Pakistan and India exchanged lists of prisoners in each other’s custody through diplomatic channels on Monday, the foreign office said in a statement.

This exchange, occurring simultaneously in Islamabad and New Delhi, follows the Consular Access Agreement of 2008, which mandates such exchanges on January 1 and  July 1 each year.

Pakistan provided a list of 254 Indian or presumed Indian civilian prisoners and fishermen in Pakistani jails. India, in turn, shared a list of 452 Pakistani or presumed Pakistani civilian prisoners and fishermen in Indian jails.

Additionally, Pakistan handed over a list of 38 missing Pakistani defence personnel, believed to be in India's custody since the wars of 1965 and 1971.

"The Government of Pakistan has called for the immediate release and repatriation of all Pakistani prisoners who have completed their sentences in India," said the statement.

Read also: Pakistan, Iran agree on prisoners’ release

"We have also requested special consular access to various presumed Pakistani prisoners, including those who are physically and mentally challenged, and for the expeditious confirmation of their national status."

The statement added that Pakistan has urged India to ensure the safety, security, and well-being of all Pakistani or presumed Pakistani prisoners awaiting their release and repatriation.

"The Government of Pakistan is committed to addressing humanitarian matters as a priority," the official continued. "We will continue our efforts to ensure the early return of all Pakistani prisoners in Indian jails."

As part of these efforts, the repatriation of 62 Pakistani prisoners in 2023, and four in the current year, has been secured so far.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ