JI to take 'bogus Form-47 govt' to Supreme Court

Says party can play leading role in getting Pakistan out of crises if stakeholders agree to step back


Our Correspondent April 30, 2024
JI leader Hafiz Naeemur Rehman. PHOTO: FILE

print-news
KARACHI:

 

Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) has announced that it will head to the Supreme Court to address the election results and rectify the debacle of bogus Form-47.

JI Ameer Engr Hafiz Naeemur Rehman said that the JI was ready to step up and take the reins in navigating Pakistan out of its current crises, provided that all stakeholders agree to step back.

He further said that the JI will move the apex court to undo the of “bogus Form-47 government”.

He expressed these views during a "meet the press" event held at the Karachi Press Club on Monday.

Addressing the gathering, the newly-elected JI ameer stressed the importance of adhering to constitutional positions by all, including politicians and institutions, to pave the way for progress.

Discussing the ongoing situation, he cautioned against the detrimental effects of internal conflicts within institutions and clashes among state organs, asserting that Pakistan cannot afford such divisions.

He elaborated that it is imperative for all political factions to recognize the gravity of the situation and support the formation of a government based on authentic Form-45s.

Rejecting the fraudulent Form-47 regime, he called for unity among political forces in this regard.The JI leader also expressed his astonishment over the role of the PML-N in the prevailing situation.

He expressed his displeasure over what he called the adjustment of relatives in the governmental setup.

He said that the ambush on the local government elections in Karachi and the general elections across Pakistan paved the way to install a fake government but despite all this, there was no writ of the government in the country.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ