The Rawalpindi City Traffic Police is facing a novel challenge in the wake of the promotion of a substantial number of sub-inspectors, which has led to an excess number of inspectors in the department.
According to sources within the department, the number of inspector-level officers is well over the number of allotted seats.
The surplus inspectors are currently handling duties as duty officers, with others awaiting departmental promotion after completing required courses.
The initiative for promotions across Punjab police, initiated during IG Dr Usman Anwar's tenure, aimed to boost confidence and enhance efficiency within the police force. However, concerns are emerging in Rawalpindi about the increasing number of inspectors and the potential challenges in finding suitable postings.
Parallelly, a survey has been initiated in Punjab to gather opinions from wardens regarding promotions. Traffic police officers from Lahore have approached the Punjab IG seeking departmental promotions, stating that they have cleared the Punjab Public Service Commission exams but face challenges in the aftermath.
Read Two independents complain of police harassment
In response, the IGP ordered a survey, seeking opinions on promotions based on seniority lists or including consideration for the public service exam.
Caretaker Punjab CM and IGP have been requested to address the situation. Police officers have suggested opening deputation opportunities for inspectors and wardens in various departments across the province.
Upon the establishment of CTP in 2007, 100 inspector seats were allocated for Rawalpindi. Later, the number of seats was increased.
Currently, the CTP operates in Murree and other tehsils, with the recent promotions bringing the number of inspectors to over 250.
The Express Tribune attempted to contact the Punjab Additional Traffic IG for a statement, but calls went unanswered.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 8th, 2024.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ