RO summoned over appeal against Nawaz’s nomination papers

Appellant asks whether or not the apex court's decision is binding on all institutions

Former prime minister Nawaz Sharif addressing a parliamentary board meeting in Karachi on December 18, 2023. PHOTO: TWITTER/ @pmln_org

LAHORE:

An election appellate tribunal on Wednesday summoned the returning officer (RO) on an appeal filed against the acceptance of PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif's nomination papers from NA-130.

The objection raised pertained to Nawaz's lifetime disqualification.

The registrar's office had initially raised objections to the appeal for not annexing the attested copy of the RO's decision, however, Justice Rasaal Hassan Syed of the tribunal removed the objection.

The appellant asked the election tribunal if the nomination papers of an individual who has been disqualified by the Supreme Court can be accepted and whether the judgement of the apex court was not binding on all institutions.

The appellant also questioned the possibility of being restricted from contesting elections without an adverse order from the RO.

Read Nawaz Sharif’s nomination papers for NA-130 challenged

The petitioner emphasised the unique nature of the matter, asserting that their nomination papers were rejected without any objection. The petitioner’s counsel argued that their client faced punishment for demanding the nomination papers of Nawaz, against whom objections were intended.

The petitioner implored the tribunal that the RO of constituency NA-130 had first refused to give the petitioner a copy of the nomination papers of Nawaz when he disclosed before him that he wanted to file objections against Nawaz. After the RO’s refusal, he had to file a sole objection that Nawaz’s nomination papers could not be accepted in the presence of lifetime disqualification by the country’s top court.

Furthermore, the petitioner further stated that the RO declined to provide the receipt of the objection. Astonishingly, despite the RO's assurance of no objections against the petitioner, their name was excluded from the final list, while Nawaz had been included in the candidate’s list.

The petitioner appealed to the LHC to overturn the RO's decision, arguing for the exclusion of their name and the rejection of Nawaz's nomination papers due to permanent lifetime disqualification.

 

 

RELATED

Load Next Story