A case of integrity and ethics

We cannot rule out the role of others in the run for the AG position becoming a ‘source’ for the media to malign Rana.

Rasul Bakhsh Rais September 04, 2011

Had I not known Mr Akhtar Buland Rana, the newly appointed auditor-general (AG) of Pakistan, for the past 42 years, I would have been duped by the baseless stories making rounds in the media about him. We have watched some talk show hosts and a representative of the PML-N spouting venom with disgust against Rana. As a columnist for the last 36 years and as a public intellectual, I have defended freedom of the media and believe it is the first step toward democratising Pakistan. But is media freedom a free licence to malign individuals in position of power in the bureaucracy or politics?

Can the media assume responsibility to be the jury, the judge and the executioner? No. If that happens, and I am sorry to say it is happening, it is shoddy journalism and may serve to undermine the credibility of the channels and the talk-show hosts responsible. I believe many of these new recruits are without any training in journalism, history, politics and humanities and have already degraded the quality of discourses.

Sadly, quite a few media persons work with an agenda passed on to them from some hidden hands who like to spin some stories while suppressing others. In maligning Rana, we cannot rule out the role of other aspirants in the run for the AG position in becoming a ‘source’ for the media. Besides, Rana carries the burden of a government which has lost the trust of the people and carries little credibility both with the media and with ordinary citizens when it comes to appointments in high positions. Whatever the past wrongdoings of the government or its poor standing, we cannot paint all its decisions black. Two things are important in this respect. First, each case has to be examined on its own merit rather than be judged as motivated by ill intentions. Second, public discourses are a sacred trust that require us to engage on issues with fairness and integrity.

I have seldom seen a story as one-sided, with as rough a language and tendency to be superficial as far as substantiation is concerned as in the case of Rana. His detractors had one thing in mind — to make his appointment controversial, hoping some quarters of the state would notice. Sadly, this has happened. Rana and many others because of their positions in the bureaucracy cannot come forward to defend themselves and are condemned to be guilty without evidence and/or substantive argument.

I understand the ethnic prejudice and discomfort of the PML-N with the appointment of Rana, a Seraiki from the Seraiki region, but cannot understand how and why a section of the media has been one-sided.

Rana comes from a very humble background and from the most backward region of Punjab. He has struggled all his life and served this country with unflinching commitment and devotion. His only drawback is his place of birth, class, ethnicity and the fact that he is not part of the traditional social circles whose members have dominated top positions in the government of Pakistan.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 5th,  2011.


JK | 11 years ago | Reply

Prof Raees's the LUMS professor journalistic standards have fallen low to this extent where he parochially analyse the appointment of Rana. Nowhere does the good professor come with evidence to counter all those accusations heaped on his friend Rana!

Tanvir | 11 years ago | Reply

Had Prof Rais avoided two things to ascertain the credibility of Mr Rana I would have believed that Mr Rana is an able man just maligned by media campaign: 1) "Had I not known Mr Akhtar Buland Rana, the newly appointed auditor-general (AG) of Pakistan, for the past 42 years". Isn't Prof taking the same role of judge and executioner upon himself that he despises so much in the detractors Mr Rana. 2) To bring ethnicity into argument. Simply pathetic PML N is in no way averse to Seraiki belt.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Most Read