Pakistan, Afghanistan agree to remove trade hurdles

Will streamline trade processes, provide conducive environment


Our Correspondent May 07, 2023
The Pak-Afghan border at Chaman. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD:

Pakistan and Afghanistan have underscored the need for streamlining and simplifying trade procedures to reduce bottlenecks and ensure a conducive environment for bilateral ties. The matter came up for discussion at a highlevel meeting co-chaired by Federal Minister for Commerce Syed Naveed Qamar and his Afghan counterpart Haji Nooruddin Azizi on Saturday.

Senior officials from both sides participated in the huddle. Detailed deliberations were held on various important aspects, including customs cooperation, border management, reduction in tariffs and issues related to pharmaceutical and meat industries. Each side expressed its commitment to strengthening trade ties and addressing the challenges emerging in the bilateral relationship.

The two ministers emphasised the significance of smooth customs processes and efficient border management to facilitate trade and enhance economic cooperation. They called for enhancing trade volumes and expanding the range of traded goods between Pakistan and Afghanistan. On the occasion, the importance of diversifying trade beyond traditional items and exploring new avenues of economic cooperation was acknowledged.

Officials of the two sides outlined the potential benefits of investing in transportation and logistics infrastructure, which would contribute to increased trade activity and economic growth. They pledged to work together to create a more favourable trade environment. Separately, a four-member Nigerian delegation, led by Minister for Aviation Hadi Sirika, called on Commerce Minister Naveed Qamar. They engaged in discussions on increasing people-to-people contacts, promoting cultural exchanges, boosting tourism and enhancing economic cooperation.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ