The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Thursday reserved its decision on a plea filed by PTI leader Shahbaz Gill seeking direction to quarters concerned for not barring his travel to the United States and restricting them from creating any hindrance in his journey to the airport.
Gill filed the petition through Barrister Ahmad Pansota, demanding provision of the details of first information reports (FIRs) registered against him and protective bails in any FIR either lodged, concealed or disclosed before the LHC during the proceedings so that the petitioner may approach the court for pre-arrest bail.
As proceedings commenced, the petitioner’s counsel argued that on April 10, 2022, immediately after the vote of no confidence against former premier Imran Khan, Gill and others were placed on the Provisional National Identification List (PNIL).
He continued that when they challenged it before Islamabad High Court (IHC), the petitioner’s name was removed from PNIL, and the writ petition was disposed of. He contended that after the vote of no confidence the incumbent government started to register criminal cases against the leadership of the PTI, including Gill, to arrest them and to place their names on the Exit Control List (ECL).
Pansota continued that Gill was also victimised and roped in several criminal cases registered across Pakistan. “The petitioner, against the actions of the respondents and the government, knocked on the doors of the courts whereupon several criminal cases were quashed and, in some cases, either Gill was declared innocent or granted the concession of bail”.
The lawyer stated that Gill later discovered that his name was on the ECL as of October 17, 2022, with the approval of the cabinet.
“This unlawful act and omission of placing the name of the petitioner on the ECL were assailed by the petitioner before LHC wherein a larger bench was constituted,” he said.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 7th, 2023.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ