SC fixes appeals in cypher leak case for hearing

Justice Masood will take up case in his chamber on 24th


Our Correspondent January 21, 2023
In this file photo, PM Imran is waving a 'threat letter' allegedly sent by a foreign power.

ISLAMABAD:

The Supreme Court on Saturday fixed for hearing appeals against the Registrar Office’s objections in petitions, seeking an investigation through a Memogate-style high-powered commission into alleged ‘foreign conspiracy’ behind the ouster of former prime minister Imran Khan’s government.

SC judge Justice Sardar Tariq Masood will hear the appeals in his chamber on January 24 (Tuesday).

Petitioner Naeem Ul Hassan through Azhar Siddique had filed a petition in the Supreme Court, praying that a high-powered commission of inquiry should be constituted to hold inquisitorial proceedings with regard to the anti-state activities conducted by the respondent political parties through mala fide and abuse of power under the provisions of the Constitution and for committing sedition and treason against the democratically and legally elected government.

The respondents named in the petition include the Federation of Pakistan, Prime Minister’s Office, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Law, National Assembly speaker, Election Commission of Pakistan, Federal Investigation Agency, PTI, PML-N, PPP, JUI-F, and MQM-P.

The petitioner said that PM Imran had taken various measures to restore normalcy in the affairs of the state but local political parties had been “aiding and assisting extremism in the country”.

However, the registrar returned the petition on the grounds that the petitioner had not pointed out as to what questions of public interest were involved with reference to fundamental rights.

“The ingredients for evoking extra ordinary jurisdictions of this court under Article 184 (3) have not been satisfied.”

The registrar also explained that the petitioner had not approached any other appropriate forum to resolve the issue or provided any justification for not doing so. Among the other reasons, the registrar said multiple misconceived prayers were made in the petition.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ