At least 4,533 teachers of Sindh are absent from their duties, while the education department has been able to dismiss only 77 truant educators from service, said a report submitted before the Sindh High Court on Friday.
Thousands of schools in the province have shut down over the past 10 years due to absence of teachers, said Education Secretary Ghulam Akbar Laghari in the report submitted to the court.
The Sindh High Court (SHC) asked Sindh Chief Secretary Sohail Rajput to file a detailed report in two weeks on the education reforms in the province and mandatory free education.
The hearing was held on petitions regarding educational reforms in the province, free education, security and other issues on Friday.
The chief secretary and other officials appeared before the court. The counsel for the petitioner said there is no implementation of the Sindh Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2013.
Providing free and standard education to the children is the responsibility of the government. The Education Secretary Ghulam Akbar Laghari also submitted report in the court.
According to report, 4,533 teachers of Sindh are still absent from their duties. Thousands of schools in the province are closed from 10 years.
Report said that among 40,529 schools in the province, 6,407 are without roofs and ratio of admission in these schools is very low also. Moreover, teacher and students are not willing to go to roofless schools.
There is massive shortage of furniture also in the government schools. Issue of purchasing of furniture is in court, that's why there is no purchasing of furniture for the schools.
Many children leave schools because they cannot study on floor.
According to the report, teachers' organisations are also responsible for the absence of teachers. At least 4,533 teachers are absent from duty and action against them will be complete in four months.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 12th, 2022.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ