Not all extremists are terrorists, says ex-jihadist

"All terrorists are extremists but not all extremists are terrorists,”


Salman Siddiqui June 25, 2010

“There’s a difference between an extremist and a terrorist. All terrorists are extremists but not all extremists are terrorists,” claimed a former member of a UK-based jihadist group, Hizb ut Tahrir.

Majid Nawaz explained that an extremist may impose his ideology on people through non-violent means as compared to a terrorist. However, he quickly added that both are equally reprehensible and must be condemned openly by the civil society.

The NGO Individualland organised a seminar ‘Citizens as Active Stakeholders of Peace’ on Friday, when 32-year-old Majid Nawaz, spoke on peace.

Nawaz, a British citizen of Pakistani origin was a member of Hizb ut Tahrir until 2007 and has served five years in an Egyptian jail. After resigning from the extremist organisation, he became the director of a UK-based Quillam Peace Foundation.

“There’s a dire need for members of the civil society to counter the powerful narrative of jihadists,” said newly transformed peacenik, Nawaz.

“The Islamists’ propaganda claims that since only Muslims are being attacked all around the world, Islam as a religion is under threat,” he said. “Nothing could be further from the truth,” he added, admitting that he himself was involved in spreading such narratives.

He cited the recent attack on Ahmedis in Lahore as an example of how extremism can be propagated through law. Nawaz believed that Ahmedis have been facing religious persecution for decades because of the country’s laws against them.

“Such laws do not mean they are right even if they were passed by the majority in a parliament,” he stressed, “Even Hitler was elected by the majority but that did not mean that the fascist ideology he propagated was right.”

“The terms jihad and khilafat have been hijacked by these extremists and terrorists and as citizens of the world, we must not allow these terms to be monopolised,” he said.

Nawaz believed that Quranic concepts are being manipulated by terrorists for their violent causes and must be re-contextualised.

It is a myth that extremists are uneducated people and because of a lack of education they turn towards violent extremism, he said.

He gave his own example where he became radicalised during the time he was pursuing a Masters degree in political theory from the London School of Economics (LSE).

“We forget that Osama bin Laden was an engineer. His deputy Aymal al Zawahiri was a medical doctor. Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, the British citizen of Pakistani descent who murdered Daniel Pearl in Karachi, studied at the LSE. Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square bomber, graduated from a business school in the US,” he pointed out.

“Every individual in the country needs to stand up and take responsibility for the situation. Else they will have no one, but themselves to blame,” Nawaz warned.

Speaking at the seminar, director of the Centre for Peace and Conflict Jami Chandio said that the way forward for citizens to become stakeholders in peace was to take part in the political process of the country.

“Individuals may be flawed but the process of democracy is not,” he said, adding that people should not be disheartened with the current lot of their leaders. Instead, they should work towards improving the system through active participation. Gulmina Bilal, Director Individualland Pakistan, Amir Rana, Director Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies and Nazir Leghari from Daily Awam were among the others who spoke.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 26th, 2010.

COMMENTS (6)

Shamsher singh Jatta | 14 years ago | Reply When ever or where ever any community is met with or faced with injustices, discriminatory treatment or oppressive measures and is not capable to fight back a frustration takes place and then grows up a radical feeling. This is not limited to Muslims only, like when Akal Takht of Golden Temple was attacked and destroyed by Indira Gandhi and Sikhs were killed in Delhi and through out India by the Hindus, Sikhs were radicalized and demanded a separate country like Khalistan and all Sikhs joined this movement whether educated or uneducated rich or poor like Sumaranjit Singh Mann was an I.P.S. officer but became radicalized. So when Muslims are being killed in hundreds and thousands every where in India after 1947 and their place of worship are demolished and destroyed like Babri Masjid, 2,000 Muslims were burnt alive and their property and businesses were destroyed in Gujrat by the order of the Chief Minister Narendra Modi. The Hindu Muslim riots are organized by the fanatic, barbaric and communal Hindus every where in India to terrorize Muslims and to destroy their economy, Muslims are being discriminated every where in India their employment ratio is only 2% in Government jobs. Then comes the Kashmir issue which is lurking for more than 60 years and Kashmiris are killed every day and according to Amnesty International Report more than 80,000 Kashmiris have been killed by the Indian Security Forces in Kashmir. Then comes Israel Palestinian issue which is not secret from any one, the economical blockade of Palestine by Israel, building illegal settlements on the Palestinian territory every day, attack on Palestine with most sophisticated nuclear weapons. Attack on Iraq on a wrong pretext and killing hundreds of thousands of Muslims then comes Afghanistan and Pakistan. The indiscriminate drone attacks in Pakistan almost every day. People should look both sides of the story then decide what and why radicalism is growing among Muslims.
Sadia Hussain | 14 years ago | Reply Radicalization acts as the pre-steps to terrorism and radical elements are in abundance in Pakistan. The seminar by Individualland is indeed a commendable effort to engage the citizens as stakeholder in peace-building process
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ