Contempt quashed

The case may be over but it has generated enough heat


October 04, 2022

The Sword of Damocles hanging over Imran Khan’s head is off for good. The contempt of court proceedings against the PTI chief were quashed in a show of magnanimity by the Islamabad High Court. The case was booked in the backdrop of a diatribe in which Mr Khan indulged himself, as he vowed to sue a lady judicial officer who had granted remand to another party worker. Since then it was all a media trial, and the government was prompt in taking cognizance by even trying to arrest the former prime minister leading to upping the ante over the weekend. Nonetheless, the curtain on one of the most talked about cases came down as the court in a unanimous decision accepted the apology, and appreciated the largesse of the accused who had walked up to the court of the lady judge to tender an unconditional apology.

The case may be over but it has generated enough heat. It was in hype at a time when the political stakeholders were engaged in serious confrontation, unmindful of national constraints. PTI’s demand for early general elections is at odds with the coalition government’s adamant stance, which wants to see through the remaining period of parliament’s tenure and is busy mending the wrecked ship of the economy. Likewise, with farmers camping in the federal capital and Mr Khan too weighing options to march on has Balkanized the entire spectrum of rationality. Thus, the sigh of relief, at least, from the judicial context — by not carrying the case any further — despite court’s observations that prima facie it was a perfect case of contempt is a way forward.

The society has, of late, seen a lot of judicial activity. The focus of media and civil society remains glued to the honourable benches because they are often burdened with litigations which otherwise the political entities should themselves address in all sincerity. It necessitates a decorum so that foul-mouthing and unwise executive decisions do not end up in the court of law. This is where the test of political wisdom rests.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 4th, 2022.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (2)

Salman Khan | 2 years ago | Reply
S.R.H. Hashmi | 2 years ago | Reply From what little I know about contempt of court cases I understand that an apology is usually treated as acceptable only if tendered at the earliest possible opportunity in writing is unconditional and the contemnor places himself at the mercy of the court. However despite being given successive opportunities to comply with Imran Khan failed to meet the above conditions. We are told that Imran Khan actually went to Sessions Court to submit personal apology to Judge Zeba Chaudhry who happened to be on leave and Imran Khan advised the staff there to convey his apology to her. Now I would think that if Imran Khan really wanted to meet her he as a matter of routine and courtesy ought to have made an appointment with her or at least enquired whether she would be available and could spare time to meet him. However since this obvious step was not taken by Imran Khan we can t say with certainty as to what Imran Khan true feelings were at that time. Cynics could even claim that the gentleman went there with prior knowledge of her absence from office on the occasion in order to avoid having to apologize to her. In any case there was nothing to prevent him from leaving at the premises a written apology seeking her forgiveness which option apparently was not exercised. Moreover considering the fact that the person has acquired quite a reputation for hurling abuses at others including prestigious state institutions he is most likely to take any leniency shown towards him as a sign of weakness which I think is not the impression that any court would or should like to convey. Also the person threatened were not the high court judges but rather a judge of a lower court and a female judge for that matter. In such a case the high court judges had a greater responsibility to defend protect her and were expected to show more firmness towards the contemnor. In these circumstances I can only say that I find the court verdict somewhat disappointing. Karachi
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ