Is Pakistan aligned with Beijing or Washington?

With the funneling of aid and IMF nod resting at Washington’s largesse, Pakistan will have to make a tough calculus


Ishtiaq Ali Mehkri May 19, 2022
The writer is the Head of StratCom at Islamabad Policy Research Institute. He can be reached at iamehkri@gmail.com.

print-news

Quite recently when Pakistan cherished the principle of ‘no-camp’ politics, it was one way or the other aligned with Beijing. Strong undercurrents of geopolitics made it tilt towards China, and extend its reach to Russia, too. This was all owing to geo-economics. The thrust was made clear in no unequivocal terms by the Army Chief and the then Prime Minister at Islamabad Security Dialogue consecutively in 2021 and 2022. One more factor that motivated Pakistan to adopt a regional approach was the exit of the United States from Afghanistan, and that too in a quick fix. Having played the role of a great guarantor in ensuring that American interests are not harmed, as they were evacuated out of Kabul, Islamabad had strategically made its indispensable position loud and clear.

Yet misgivings with Washington reigned on. The root cause of discord was the ‘absolutely not’ dictum pronounced by Mr Imran Khan on the demand for bases and airspace to the lone superpower. President Biden’s administration was playing the role of an injured wolf, and was eager to stage a comeback in the mountainous terrain of Southwest Asia. But their plans were torpedoed by several Central Asian states under Russian influence, and even by Kazakhstan. The UAE and Saudi Arabia too stood alienated, and were not on talking terms with Biden. Islamabad’s ‘no’ was more than enough to breed bad blood. And if diplomatic chronicle is any criterion, the distrust in the previous government from White House was too candid to make the difference felt. And the change of command was fait accompli.

So where does Pakistan stand today? Is it with China or the US? The new political polity is in a fix to state the obvious. It is in a swirling mode between two poles of power. One of its prime concerns is to seek economic legitimacy from international donors who are all based in Washington, and hold the immediate succour. On the other hand, it is Beijing which is one of the biggest game-changers in Pakistan with more than $60 billion investment in the pipeline under the CPEC initiative. Not to mention the new out-of-the-box solution that the previous government had cultivated with Russia to seek cheap oil and wheat, which is now nowhere in sight. So how will Pakistan navigate its way out of this crisscross and what are the options at hand?

As far as CPEC is concerned, it is still to take off and its slow pace of implementation is worrisome. Beijing is not happy as the project is five years behind schedule. Gigantic turnkey projects such as ML-I are in labyrinth. Only three out of nine special economic zones are in full gear, and the process that would have led to industrialisation and rapid agricultural yield is mired in confusion. So is the case with probable access to India and beyond via Wagah. Estimates say Pakistan has lost more than $40 billion in foreign investment as it was unable to keep the pace, and the money is now parked in Southeast Asian states.

Islamabad is increasingly under pressure from the US to distance itself from China. But CPEC enjoys complete consensus from the security and political establishments of Pakistan. What is bothering is its pace of realisation. With the funneling of aid and IMF nod resting at Washington’s largesse, Pakistan will have to make a tough calculus. While Islamabad will never abandon the Beijing route, it can always play Macbeth. But that would be suicidal.

What Washington is asking in the disguise of new orientation from Pakistan is too deadly to deliver: recognition of Israel, hegemony of India and a cold shoulder to Kashmiris. This is tantamount to a strategic debacle for Pakistan. Neither the nation, nor the security establishment would let that happen. Pakistan has to take a conscious call now in its long-term interests. The United States is too important to be ignored. But the perils are high in towing it blindly. Likewise, the Chinese and Russian cushions too are not without strings. This boils down to a one-liner: rewrite a progressive and rational policy in foreign relations.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 19th, 2022.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (5)

test | 2 years ago | Reply In my opinion Pakistan must be aligned with 1-Industrialization 2-Investment 3-Exports 4-Tourism And of course Kashmir. Since China provides a bit of above with some assembly plants and other factories working in Pakistan and also CPEC investments. But our exports to them are negligible. And no tourists come from China or US either. So overall we are a little bit aligned with China and with US IMF to get dollars bailout in order to destroy our country ourselves. Because we cannot manufacture anything in our country and import everything. Our education system and those expos or initiatives which has so far delivered nothing just showing professors and well educated type of people speaking in effluent english and well dressed suits and convincing that Pakistan is a superpower or we are living in a rich country no we are living in a 3rd world country. Man this is not how education policies are made or acted upon. I know laughing is not an option but when they are all sleeping or are aligned to destroy our country i as a citizen of Pakistan cannot offer much in this regard except to become furious or laugh. Or else one can be furious by looking where the world is going and where Pakistan is moving are two opposite directions. Overall at the end of the day Industrialization Exports Investment Tourists and of course Kashmir will matter. Those loans from IMF US will do what india is trying to achieve. Don t get too blind by not looking at it.
Sohail Butt | 2 years ago | Reply Easier sad than done. There is no foreign policy that in the current state of US belligerence and Russia s intransigence and China s desire to lead the world can enable countries like Pakistan to maintain a balanced and neutral foreign policy. It s strategic geographical location is an asset as well as foreign policy nightmare when pressures are thrown from all directions to toe only one line. It is a continuous diplomatic challenge. Remaining in no mans land as opposed to be part of a Block is too risky. Pakistan has tried and experienced USA since early 1950 s and has repeatedly been mistreated leading to mistrust and hatred among people which is currently at its peak. However Pentagon and GHQ have relatively enjoyed better relations and cooperation during the first Cold War. If US seriously desires stable relationship with Pakistan it has to recognise Pakistan s redlines. In my view it is our nuclear capability and Resolution of Kashmir dispute to the satisfaction of all the three parties to the dispute. Israel should be recognised after some form of settlement with Palestinians. Relationship with India can only progress realistically after the resolution of Kashmir dispute. USA has to stop political interference and manipulation and show more understanding of Pakistan s stand and genuine security concerns vis a vis India specially terrorism inspired and funded by India from Afghanistan and Iran. Resetting relationship between Pakistan and US can only happen on the basis of above lined parameters and after the new government as a result of elections have been sworn in which in all probable cases will be PTI. The Onus of establishing working and then deep relationship between Biden led state department and Imran Khan lead Pakistan Foreign office lies with USA. In future Imran Khan should make an extra effort to repair US Pakistan relationship based on equality mutual trust and fairness and forget about the recent bitter past.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ