‘Imran never helps his aides involved in corruption’, Hammad tells Aleem

Estranged PTI leader Aleem Khan launches tirade against PM Imran, regrets supporting the party


News Desk/Imran Adnan April 05, 2022
Abdul Aleem Khan. PHOTO: ONLINE

LAHORE:

PTI leaders hit back at their estranged party fellow Aleem Khan for launching a tirade against Prime Minister Imran Khan, saying the premier is not sincere to the nation.

In a tweet, former energy minister Hammad Azhar said it was PM Imran’s trait that he did not protect even his aides if they were involved in any wrongdoing.

“Aleem Khan, it was your mistake to expect from Imran Khan that he would save you from NAB investigation. Imran Khan does not benefit anyone outside the law in business or land matters,” he added.

Former information minister Fawad Chaudhry expressed regret over Aleem’s statement, saying that all allegations that the latter hurled at PM Imran would ultimately damage his own reputation.

Aleem, who served as senior Punjab minister, and recently announced to support the opposition’s candidate for the Punjab Chief Minister post, accused the prime minister of not being sincere to the nation.

The estranged leader also regretted that he dedicated 10 years of his life to the Pakistan Tahreek-e-Insaf (PTI). “I supported the party with complete dedication and hard work for Naya Pakistan in the face of Imran Khan. I'm sad that the person I spent 10 years of my life for is not sincere with the nation,” he lamented.

He criticised PM Imran on various accounts, including National Accountability Bureau (NAB) cases against him, retaining Usman Buzdar as the chief minister and the latest nomination of PML-Q leader Chaudhry Pervez Elahi as the new Punjab chief minister.

Also read: Aleem airs Punjab-related grievances with Nawaz

Aleem Khan pointed out that PTI has 183 members in Punjab Assembly but PM Imran nominated Pervaiz Elahi for chief minister slot just to secure support of five MNAs in National Assembly.

Not even a single PTI member in the house is capable to run the chief minister’s office, he questioned.

“I had been supporting the party from 2010 to 2018. I had been given the responsibility to provide diesel, water and food during the 126-day long sit-in in Islamabad and rewarded with the label of traitor to the party. I was put behind bars over corruption allegations but no reference was filed against me. What I did wrong that I was summoned by the NAB four times. Imran Khan wanted to appoint Buzdar as chief minister but why I was sent behind bars. I came to know in NAB office that Buzdar has been elected as chief minister,” he disclosed.

He also questioned the role of Farrah, first lady’s friend, in provincial bureaucracy. “If Prime Minister Imran Khan was so truthful, he should face me publicly,” he maintained.

COMMENTS (4)

test | 2 years ago | Reply I think aleem wanted to become CM while PM Khan was not in favor of it neither was other candidates. PM Khan was new in the Punjab politics while Elahi had already served as the CM so i think that was the logic of appointing Buzdar on the recommendation of Elahi. So it seems that is the case then he should have left the PTI to go for other parties which offer him CM post but guess no party offer him CM post. So it is better to listen to the leader PM Khan but leaders can be wrong too and one should not form a group instead show a solid performance such that leader would have no other option but to appoint that one also he must not be corrupt. As far as corruption is concerned a corrupt will be a corrupt no matter what so on that point i agree with hammad and fawad. Aleem s cases with NAB has nothing to do with PM Khan if there would be any irregularities that would have been from aleem khan.
Mohammed.fiaz | 2 years ago | Reply you look like a self interested pti has admitted the mistake letting people like you join the party it is people like you are a disgrace to the country.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ