Finding common ground in Afghanistan

All countries with a stake in Afghanistan need to cooperate to effectively contend with IS-K and Al-Qaeda


Syed Mohammad Ali January 07, 2022
The writer is an academic and researcher. He is also the author of Development, Poverty, and Power in Pakistan, available from Routledge

print-news

There is much finger-pointing between the US, other NATO states, and non-NATO allies like Pakistan, about the prevalent precarity within Afghanistan. Blame games may offer political mileage, but they imply a grave toll for Afghanistan, and strategic instability for the broader region and beyond.

No one predicted the speed with which the Afghan government would fall to Taliban forces. But despite their surprisingly swift military victory, the ability of the Taliban to rule Afghanistan remains uncertain. The floodgates of potential refugee flows into neighbouring states like Pakistan and Iran, which would have invariably accompanied a civil war-like situation in Afghanistan, have been averted for now, but this threat lingers. The Taliban face multiple changes to create an effective government, and to clamp down on militant proxies or terror groups with global ambitions.

Afghanistan desperately needs to build a homegrown governance system, which is representative, and which does not continue to become more repressive. It is also vital to prevent chaos in the country which could unleash another humanitarian disaster and provide a fecund environment to extremist outfits such as Al-Qaeda and its offshoot, the Islamic State-Khorasan (IS-K), an affiliate of the central ISIS group in the Middle East.

However, the international community remains reluctant to go beyond providing meagre humanitarian support, to unfreeze Afghan assets, and resume international aid. Meanwhile, the Taliban find themselves locked into an intensifying rivalry with IS-K.

IS-K is now portraying itself as a Taliban rejectionist group, by claiming that the Taliban have somehow sold out or been coopted by the Americans, and it is IS-K which now represents the spirit of anti-imperial resistance. Such posturing is not only indicative of IS-K political connivance, but this nature of propaganda places severe limits on the Taliban’s ability to show political leniency.

The Taliban’s announcement of a largely Pushtun and all-male caretaker government was not only an illustration of ideological myopia, but it was also compelled by the need to avert the IS-K from exploiting internal dissent within the ranks of the Taliban.

Pakistan has already seen IS-K being emboldened across the Durand Line, besides the Taliban themselves challenging the status of this demarcation as an international border. IS-K affiliates, such as the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), have also become more active, and they have been known to target Chinese investors in Pakistan in solidarity with the Eastern Turkmenistan Islamic Movement (ETIM).

The threat of IS-K gaining strength in Afghanistan is an issue of concern for not only Afghanistan, but for Pakistan, China and other regional states, besides the US. While all states agree that IS-K and Al-Qaeda should not be given an opportunity to regroup in Afghanistan, there is a major difference of opinion about other militant outfits. Contending with ETIM and TTP remains a priority for China and Pakistan, but the US is less concerned about these latter groups. Pakistan also fears that India will take advantage of the turmoil in Afghanistan to resume support of militancy in Balochistan. On the other hand, India is concerned with the re-energisation of militant groups which operate in Kashmir.

Instead of using Afghanistan as a tit-for-tat arena for stoking trouble in rival states, all countries with a stake in Afghanistan need to cooperate to effectively contend with IS-K and Al-Qaeda. If such cooperation succeeds, it may enable needed collaboration to curb illicit opium production and to make the Afghan economy more sustainable.

Afghanistan has an immensely valuable geostrategic location, which is at the crossroads of Central and South Asia, and it has mineral deposits worth nearly $1 trillion. Yet, regional trade possibilities and increased foreign investments to inject life into the Afghan economy can only materialise if Afghanistan’s descent into chaos is averted.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 7th, 2022.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (1)

Farooq | 2 years ago | Reply Pakistanis are not supportive towards present Afghan rulers rather a US song is being sung broad based government . Why ruling parties of countries like Pakistan and USA are not making broad based governments at their end . As a result of towing US policy line a shallow thinking has developed and can be seen all around.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ