Human rights activists discuss India’s settler colonialism in Kashmir

Speakers say New Delhi always treated Kashmir as a colony


APP October 07, 2021

MIRPUR:

Raising alarm over India's hegemonic designs and its colonial policies towards Kashmir, speakers at a webinar termed Indian settler colonialism as the biggest threat Kashmiris have faced since India took control of the territory illegally in 1947.

The webinar titled “The Impacts of Settler Colonialism in Indian Occupied Jammu Kashmir’’ was organised by the World Muslim Congress (WMC) in collaboration with Kashmir Institute of International Relations (KIIR) on the sidelines of the 48th session of United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) on Wednesday.

The webinar was attended and addressed by noted human rights activists, international law experts, social activists and academicians including Shahani Hamid, Nayeem Ahmad Khan, rights activist Muhammad Ahsan Untoo and others while the event was moderated by KIIR chairman and WMC permanent representative Altaf Hussain Wani.

The speakers while highlighting the dangerous dimensions of Indian setter colonialism said that abrogation of Kashmir’s special status was further evidence that Kashmir has moved from Patrick Wolfe’s first to the second model of colonialism.

Subsequently, on 5 August 2019, the Indian government revoked the limited autonomy provided to Kashmir through Article 370 of the Constitution.

Read More: Pakistan urges OIC to take concrete steps for resolution of Kashmir issue

The panelists observed that the change in the constitutional status of the state was purposely made to grant the Indian government the much needed political and legal leverage to bring material change in the region through the wholesale extermination of the indigenous populations.

Referring to the changes made to article 35A and Kashmir’s age-old domicile law, they said, “Abrogation of these constitutional provisions have been top priority of the BJP government because the racist regime knew that these provisions were the only legal hindrances in its way to establish hegemonic control over Kashmir.”

Drawing parallels between the Indian apartheid regime’s imperialistic policies on Kashmir and Wolfe’s first model of colonisation to the second model, the speakers said that marginalisation of majority population in Kashmir, policies of land grab, wholesale extermination of the locals, exploitation of natural resources, rampant aggression, arbitrary arrests, forced disappearances and systematic genocide of Kashmiri youth by the Indian forces were obvious manifestations of the racist regime’s apocalyptic vision and attitude towards Kashmir and Kashmiris.

Underlining Modi government’s communal policies, the panelists regrettably noted that the current dispensation in India viewed settler colonialism as a final solution to the Kashmir dispute.

They said that successive Indian governments always treated Kashmir as a colony and exploited its natural resources, killed and maimed its population with full impunity through heavy militarization.

“The new set of rules that can be termed as constitutional terrorism have hazardous impacts including demographic changes that will fundamentally change the nature of the freedom movement, its political and religious landscape, culture, language and identity in Kashmir”, they said.

All these manipulations and constitutional amendments are in contravention of UN Security Council resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir, international human rights, humanitarian law, 4th Geneva Conventions and India’s international obligations, they added.

Terming Indian hegemonic designs as the biggest threat to regional peace, the speakers said that it was high time that the international community and UN Human rights bodies play their part to hold India accountable and put a halt to the current machinations of India, which pose a serious existential threat to Kashmiris.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read