Shehbaz invites parties to talk on electoral reforms

Opposition to chalk out joint strategy on 7th, come up with their own recommendations


Our Correspondent July 04, 2021
Shehbaz Sharif. PHOTO: Shehbaz Sharif Facebook page

ISLAMABAD:

PML-N President Shehbaz Sharif has convened a meeting of parliamentary leaders of opposition parties on July 7 to chalk out a joint strategy on electoral reforms.

Even though the opposition parties have rejected the ruling PTI’s proposals for electoral reforms, sources said they would come up with their own recommendations, which they would submit to the government.

The sources added that the government had decided to convene a session of the National Assembly on July 7.

JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman, the president of the opposition alliance – the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) —has reached Islamabad after recovering from illness.

The sources said the PDM president had been in touch with the leaders of the parties in the alliance.

The PPP, which had parted ways from the PDM, would adopt a different strategy.

The opposition parties would also consider Prime Minister Imran Khan's offer of talks on electoral reforms.

The premier would discuss the situation with the federal cabinet as well as the PTI’s allies in the coming week.

Addressing the National Assembly recently, the premier had offered an olive branch to the opposition parties and invited them to sit with the government with the aim to improve and reform the electoral process for the sake of the future of democracy.

The prime minister pointed out that every election after 1970 had been controversial due to allegations of rigging, therefore, “the only solution to this issue [allegations of electoral fraud] is the use of EVMs [electronic voting machines]”.

“We are striving to improve the election process. We have proposed election reforms and I will request the opposition to sit with the government, as it pertains to the future of democracy in Pakistan,” he told the House.

“If they [opposition] have any reservations, we are ready to hear them out.”

Imran referred to his 21 years of cricketing experience and said the controversies of defeat and victory in the international cricket only ended after the introduction of neutral empires and the support of modern technology.

He also mentioned the campaign of the PTI after the 2013 general elections, when his party wanted the audit of only four constituencies, but the then government did not accept the demand and later the matter was decided by the court.

Last month, the lower house of parliament passed two bills on electoral reforms – pertaining to reserved seats for female members of the religious minority communities, constituencies demarcated on registered votes instead of population, granting dual citizens the right to vote, use of technology in elections and conditionally allowing dual nationals to participate in polls.

COMMENTS (2)

Frank Sterle Jr. | 3 years ago | Reply I feel that the First Past The Post FPTP electoral system just barely qualifies as democratic rule within the democracy spectrum though it seems to serve corporate interests well. I believe it is basically why powerful money interests generally resist attempts at changing from FPTP to proportional representation electoral systems of governance the latter which dilutes corporate lobbyist influence. American and Canadian governances typically maintain thinly veiled yet strong ties to large corporations as though elected heads are meant to represent big money interests over those of the working citizenry and poor. Accordingly major political decisions will normally foremost reflect what is in big business s best interests. And don t expect to hear this fact readily reported by the mainstream news-media which is concentratedly corporate owned. While authoritarian governances like China s hold much sway over the corporations within their borders and even without to some degree Western governances like those of Canada and the U.S. are in contrast steered by corporate interests sometimes through economic intimidation. Anyone who doubts the potent persuasion of huge business interests here need to consider how high-level elected officials can become crippled by implicit explicit threats to transfer or eliminate jobs and capital investment thus economic stability if corporate requests aren t met. Does Prime Minister Justin Trudeau s SNC-Lavalin affair corruption come to mind It s a crippling that s made even worse by a blaring news-media that s permitted here to be naturally critical of incumbent governments.
Frank Sterle Jr. | 3 years ago | Reply I feel that the First Past The Post FPTP electoral system just barely qualifies as democratic rule within the democracy spectrum though it seems to serve corporate interests well. I believe it is basically why powerful money interests generally resist attempts at changing from FPTP to proportional representation electoral systems of governance the latter which dilutes corporate lobbyist influence. American and Canadian governances typically maintain thinly veiled yet strong ties to large corporations as though elected heads are meant to represent big money interests over those of the working citizenry and poor. Accordingly major political decisions will normally foremost reflect what is in big business s best interests. And don t expect to hear this fact readily reported by the mainstream news-media which is concentratedly corporate owned. While authoritarian governances like China s hold much sway over the corporations within their borders and even without to some degree Western governances like those of Canada and the U.S. are in contrast steered by corporate interests sometimes through economic intimidation. Anyone who doubts the potent persuasion of huge business interests here need to consider how high-level elected officials can become crippled by implicit explicit threats to transfer or eliminate jobs and capital investment thus economic stability if corporate requests aren t met. Does Prime Minister Justin Trudeau s SNC-Lavalin affair corruption come to mind It s a crippling that s made even worse by a blaring news-media that s permitted here to be naturally critical of incumbent governments. Furthermore Western corporate lobbyists actually write bills for our governing representatives to vote for and have implemented supposedly to save the elected officials their own time. I believe the practice has become so systematic here that those who are aware of it that likely includes mainstream news-media political writers don t bother publicly discussing it. To me it s as though the elected heads are meant to represent huge money interests over those of the working citizenry and poor. Accordingly major political decisions will normally foremost reflect what is in the influential corporations best interests.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ