Tech firms pledge to end unfair competition

Move comes on back of regulators’ warning in wake of record fine against Alibaba

Afp April 16, 2021


More than 20 Chinese tech giants have made a public pact to abide by anti-monopoly guidelines, after regulators told them to note “the warning” of a record fine against e-commerce giant Alibaba.

Beijing is taking China’s tech firms to task to curtail the reach of private companies into the daily finances of the Chinese public - and, analysts say, to rein in their runaway expansion.

In a series of individual statements published by China’s market regulator on Wednesday and Thursday, some of the country’s biggest brands - including ByteDance, Baidu and CTrip - promised to “ensure fair competition”, “not abuse market dominance”, and “not implement unfair price behavior”.

The oaths come after regulators summoned 34 tech companies on Tuesday and warned them to rectify any anti-competitive measures and heed the warning of Alibaba’s case.

The firms were given one month to undergo complete rectification after conducting internal checks, and to correct practices that harmed competition.

Ride-hailing service Didi, video platforms Kuaishou and Bilibili, as well as e-commerce firm are also among those who have since published commitments. said it would not force the practice of “choosing one of two” on its retailers - where merchants are compelled to work only with one platform and not its rivals - a move which Alibaba had come under fire for.

Meanwhile, in its statement, Didi pledged, “Except where necessary for regular business activities, we will not illegally collect or misuse personal information.”

The next front in Beijing’s assault on big tech could be the huge volumes of data they scoop up from China’s consumers.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 16th, 2021.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.


Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read