Hesitation fuelling inflation

Prices of sensitive food items - flour and sugar - have doubled over last two years

DR MANZOOR AHMAD November 15, 2020


If there is one issue on which all of us including the government, opposition and common man agree, it is that inflation is a giant monster to be tackled.

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation, which measures the average change in prices over time, was already high at 6.8% in 2018-19 but since then it has further increased by over 50% to 10.7% in 2019-20.

According to recent figures released by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), this is the highest rate in the Asia-Pacific region and is at least twice as high as Pakistan’s South Asian neighbours.

In the case of sensitive food items such as wheat flour and sugar, the prices have doubled over the last two years.

While steep rupee devaluation, unusual rains, locust attacks and Covid-19 may have contributed to this misfortune, Pakistan also suffered from self-inflicted wounds. These included the cumbersome decision-making process, lack of reliable data, fear of facing National Accountability Bureau (NAB) investigations and frequent transfers of top management of relevant ministries.

The decision-making process muddled the country’s ability to ensure adequate supplies of sugar and wheat flour.

The government had already been through crisis of shortage and high prices in 2019. Had lessons been learnt, we could have avoided the same mistakes in 2020.

In 2019, when it became clear that costs of essential commodities were rising sharply, exports had to be restricted immediately. However, it took many months to do so.

Even when the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) had taken decisions, the cabinet took several months to endorse them.

Year 2020 was a mirror image of 2019. The difference is that while in the earlier period, it took several months to ban exports, in 2020 it took several months to allow duty-free imports.

It had become evident in 2019 that the data used for exporting sugar was not reliable. But in several high-level meetings held in 2020, the ministers kept their faith in the same data sources. Exaggerated stock levels were only realised after continued rising prices forced physical verifications.

According to press reports, even the prime minister had foreseen the looming shortages earlier during the year and had reportedly asked for import of these commodities in good time.

While the government was still debating, it was anticipated by international markets that Pakistan would have to place a big order for import and consequently, the prices of both commodities started rising.

Had the government placed the orders for wheat in April, it would have purchased it at the then prevailing price of around $215 per ton. Due to several months of delay, the prices rose by an average of $60-75 per ton.

Given these vast losses, the government must take necessary steps to ensure that such circumstances do not arise in future. In particular, it needs to reflect on some of the issues mentioned below.

Firstly, would it not be better if the government does not get involved in buying/ selling of commodities? When it does so, it is unable to take timely decisions. When it does not, no shortages or hoarding is witnessed, such as for edible oil, tea and pulses, in which the private sector is authorised to trade.

Secondly, why does the purchase or import of any commodity have to be approved at so many levels? In addition to the usual channels, often some ad hoc committees are set up that cause a delay in decision-making.

Even the ECC cannot take this decision and it has to be endorsed by the cabinet. In no other country does a cabinet handle such issues.

Thirdly, why isn’t more attention being given to improving data collection and its availability? If the US Department of Agriculture could publish estimates of Pakistan’s production and consumption of sugar in April each year, why cannot we do so?

Fourthly, the cabinet members openly vent their frustration that bureaucrats are hesitant to act timely due to the fear of subsequent action by NAB. The government has to take action in this situation through changes in the legislation, considering how such delays are causing huge losses.

Finally, there is a need to have more stability at the secretary’s level. Frequent changes cause disruptions and uncertainty. This also slows down decision-making process as the new incumbent government takes time to get familiar with the issues.

It is essential to take immediate action to simplify the decision-making process, especially in light of the losses to the exchequer and suffering caused to people.

The writer has served as Pakistan’s ambassador to WTO and FAO’s representative to the United Nations at Geneva


Published in The Express Tribune, November 16th, 2020.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.


Syed Sharfuddin | 11 months ago | Reply

Mistakes made in good faith are acceptable. What is important that lessons are learnt. Pakistan is lucky to have escaped the brunt of Covid-19 which has seriously impacted on the economies of G7 countries. But Lady Luck may not smile on us always. The sooner we learn from public policy mistakes the better it will be to kick start the wheels of economy and turn obstacles into opportunities. One final point. Government should use its existing staffing machinery to implement policies instead of recruiting an army of new advisers and special advisers and undermine the work of secretaries.

Anjum Bashir | 11 months ago | Reply

In 2009, inorder to overcome the same shortages, a policy was devised to keep stock of 500,000 m tons as reserve to meet one and a half months consumption, during which time import could be arranged for the intervening period between shortage and crushing season. That was a good policy but it had financial cost attached to its retention in godown. The following years, Pakistan was surplus and exported sugar, so the policy was focused upon. In addition to weaknesses identified by Dr. Manzoor on delays in decision making, reliance on weak data and fear of NAB etc., in my view and personal experience in handling the crisis in 2010, this delay in decision making is mainly due to two Federal Ministeries (Industries and Commerce) involvement in the case of sugar. The data collection remains under the office of Cane Commissioner, who is responsible for compilation of data on sugar stocks, monthly consumption etc. This office is under a third Ministry. All this needs effective coordination, which unfortunately is not happening well. Therefore, one Ministry needs to assume full charge of all three steps like compilation of data to import or export, as and when required to avert the ongoing crisis of price rise in the case of sugar. S. Anjum Bashir Former Federal Secretary and Former Chairman, Trading Corporation of Pakistan

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read