South Korean prosecutors indict Samsung leader Jay Y. Lee on charges concerning 2015 merger

Charges against Lee included practice of unfair transaction and manipulation of market prices


Reuters September 01, 2020
Samsung predicts $3 billion-plus in lost profits. PHOTO: REUTERS

South Korean prosecutors indicted Samsung Group leader Jay Y. Lee on charges including manipulating stock prices and breach of trust in order to cement control of the group, a prosecution official said on Tuesday.

Prosecutors decided to indict 52-year-old Lee due to the gravity of manipulating the capital market over a controversial 2015 merger of two Samsung affiliates that helped him assume greater control of the group’s crown jewel Samsung Electronics, despite an independent panel’s recommendation in June not to indict him, the official said.

Careem driver verbally abuses, harasses woman in Islamabad

Charges against Lee included the practice of unfair transaction and manipulation of market prices under the Capital Markets Act, breach of trust during the course of business, and false disclosure and accounting fraud under the External Audit Act, prosecutors said in a statement.

Lee’s lawyers did not have an immediate comment.

The indictment paves the way for Lee to undergo trial on the charges. He will not be detained as a Seoul court denied in June a request from prosecutors for an arrest warrant. But the court had said prosecutors seemed to have secured a considerable amount of evidence and it is appropriate to send the case to trial.

Online dating catches on in Pakistan

Lee is separately accused of giving horses to the daughter of a confidante of former president Park Geun-Hye to win government support for the merger of the two affiliates.

The shares of major Samsung firms were largely unchanged following the announcement. Samsung Electronics was up 0.6% and Samsung C&T had risen 3.2% versus the broader market’s 1.1% rise.

 

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ