
According to the court ruling, “Education is an independent provision of the Prison Rules, which is covered neither by Section 201 (ordinary remission) nor Section 214 (special remission). Sections 201-A and 214-A place embargo on the grant of ordinary and special remissions only, while there is nothing in these provisions about the refusal of education remission and it seems quite logical and reasonable for the reason that those persons who are convicted of the offences referred above can transform themselves into good citizens by getting proper education, so they can lead a respectable and changed life after serving the sentence.”
The thirst for knowledge in such prisoners indicates that they repented the undesirable acts which they committed, and later decided to pursue education so that they can reform themselves and live as responsible citizens. Prisons are meant to reform those who stray from the correct path and indulge in activities harmful to the state and citizens. If prisoners reform themselves truly and zealously follow the pursuit of education so that they can undo their unsavoury past, they deserve to be dealt with humanely. They should be supported by society in their endeavour to change for the better. Good conduct should be rewarded. Since the issue relates to the well-being of the state, it becomes necessary to consider the inputs from the higher authorities.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 1st, 2020.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ