WASHINGTON:
It took months of debate, statements, proposals and press conferences that provided fodder for news bulletins and comic gold for late night comedy shows, but on Tuesday afternoon, the United States Senate finally passed the debt-ceiling bill, less than 24 hours after the US House of Representatives passed the bill.
The debt ceiling bill, passed by a vote of 74-26 in Senate, will now be sent to President Obama for his signature, who must sign it before midnight to avoid the United States to default on its obligations, though it may be too late to avoid a downgrade of the country’s credit rating.
(Read: US ‘almost out of time’ for deal, Obama)
The debt-ceiling bill proposes cutting over $2 trillion in spending over the next decade, while raising the debt-ceiling limit i.e. how much the United States can legally borrow by nearly the same amount from its current figure of $14.3 trillion.
But according to many in Washington, this bill was not just a bill. With a House of Representatives controlled by Republicans, and being subject to the ideology and demands of the extreme right-wing Tea Party faction, and a Senate controlled by Democrats, it took weeks for a decision to be reached, representing what many describe as the new dysfunction in the US political system.
The Republicans wanted no changes to taxes, and proposed cuts in Social Security, the pension programme for elderly Americans, and Medicare, the healthcare programme designed to assist Americans over 65 years of age.
The Democrats, many of whom reportedly did not agree with the President’s push to “compromise”, wanted less spending cuts and an increase in taxes on the wealthy. The acrimony felt by some Democrats on the President urging for a compromise and agreeing to take taxes off the table got to the point that a Democrat leader dubbed the debt ceiling deal as a “Satan sandwich”.
In Monday’s vote in the House of Representatives, only half of the Democrats in the House voted in favour of the debt-ceiling bill. The bill was passed by a vote of 269-161, with 66 Republicans voting against the proposal, a number that almost exactly corresponds with the size of the Tea Party faction.
The spending cuts, which will be agreed on by a bipartisan committee, could range from defence to social security, as well as an overhaul of the tax codes, that would help identify the loopholes present at the moment – however, if the committee does not agree to the cuts, triggers in the legislation will automatically place cuts between defence and domestic spending.
Addressing the press on Monday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said, “Social Security, Medicaid and beneficiaries in Medicare would be excluded from any harm. The whole point of the trigger is that nobody wants to do them and that it’s equally onerous for both sides. And that, again, creates greater potential for the committee’s action to bear fruit.”
Last week, President Obama urged compromise, and addressing the nation said, “We can’t allow the American people to become collateral damage to Washington’s political warfare.”
Addressing a press conference on Tuesday, shortly after Senate passed the bill, the President said that voters may have voted for a “divided government” but they did not vote for a “dysfunctional government.”
(Read: Obama asks parties to ‘work together’)
The Associated Press and Reuters both report that President Obama has already signed the bill into law.
But the damage to the US credit rating may already have taken place. The Wall Street Journal reports that price of credit default swap contracts – or the cost of insuring against the likelihood of default – for US government bonds is now higher than that for Brazilian government bonds. (With additional input from agencies)
Published in The Express Tribune, August 3rd, 2011.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
What they need is Imran Khan, but only after Pakistan has benefited from him :)
This budget battle seems to signal a retreat from Big Government welfare-spending programs in favor of a more thrifty, less charitable Federal government. The U.S. will have to make this adjustment in the next decade for demographic reasons alone. The sooner we do so the better.
And the sooner some welfare programs are ended, the better for the poor affected by them. For example, programs allowing the poor to live in their foreclosed homes also prevents them from migrating to areas that may offer better jobs.
And next time if we want more cash we can increase this limit; and in actual there is no limit....its very easy to fool americans.
ET: Try to do balance reporting, republicans idea was not that much evil the way you portrayed.
Why Obama wanted to increase Tax on Rich ?......let them live without any tax burden as in Pakistan and let them rule
USSR invaded Afghanistan and gone in default, now whether Americans like it or not taliban are doing the exact same thing to US.Frankly speaking US wasted its $3 trillion on Iraq and Afghanistan and in fact fall for Al-Qaeda's plans, those who doesn't understand what im trying to say should read "Al Quaeda's Strategy to the Year 2020" or you could read this
Why the USA congress passess the dificit budget, if they do not want to raise the borrowing limit. This type of absurbed economic system has no parallel in the world except Denmark. They moment Congress passes the dificit budget , it is understood and assumed and approved that dificit will be filled by govt. borrowing, and hence why the govt should go again to parliament to get the celing increased.
I really fail to understand this whole tamasha in US.
Article is long on labels and short on substance. In short -- the Democrats wanted to raise the debt ceiling, increase spending, and raise taxes - the Republicans wanted to raise the debt ceiling, decrease entitlement spending and have no tax increases - the "tea party" wanted to honor the commitment they made to voters by not increasing the debt ceiling, cutting spending, reducing the size of govt and no new taxes.
Americans are paying lowest tax rates in their entire history, especially in wartimes. The candidate Obama had a mandate and both houses of congress as allies. However, he did not make any meaningful changes or improvements and squandered the chance. The rightwing fascists held the US govt hostage in the House and the timid and weak president gave in. Even though the poor Americans would be most affected by the budget cuts, but they have to come out and vote for liberals and not sit on their hands during next elections. Obama since the night of his election victory has only been looking for his re-election and nothing else. He was very lucky that the Republicans and Bush had made such a big mess even a dog could have defeated the Republicans. Once again it looks like that the Republicans have no good candidate to beat Obama in the upcoming elections. Even though I am disappointed by the sellout of Obama to the rightwing of Republicans, I have a feeling that in his second term he would be the president we all had voted for and expected in his first term. He would have no re-elections dreams and no vested interest to bend over backward to the Republicans. In addition, with the Republican’s stubbornness their popularity bubble would burst soon.
Debt ceiling is a self enforced limit. This was just a drama before elections. We already know US economy is in ICU and going to tank any day. Assuming borrowing more money and indebting the nation can lead to growth is a fallacy and is similar to a coke addict consuming more coke and think it will solve problem.
Sell USD and buy Gold.
Very liberally put. Was hoping for a more "balanced" report on the issue.
When you have people like Bachmann, Ron Paul, and Palin you will have a dis-functional and extremely fragile government. The entire tea party cult is a danger to America. The Fox noise hype is also making things much worst. Could you imagine what would happen if Palin and McCain held office during this mess. We would be in default as of today and our $ would be worth next to nothing. How dare the GOP play chicken with our economy and they have the nerve to blame Obama? What a joke and what a disgrace the tea party make for this country. God help us all if tea party gets their way next election