Pronouncing its verdict in the 13-year-old graft case – commonly known as SGS reference – an accountability court on Saturday absolved all accused, except President Asif Ali Zardari who enjoys constitutional indemnity, and declared that the prosecution has failed to substantiate the charges.
Judge Mian Altaf Hussain Mahar acquitted all the accused, including former chairman of Board of Revenue AR Siddiqui and declared that Asif Zardari, being the President of Pakistan, is immune from criminal prosecution under Article 248 (2) of the constitution.
In the 35-page judgment, the judge, however, declared several officials of SGS – a Swiss inspection, verification, testing and certification company, including director Jens Schlegelmilch and vice president Colin Robey as proclaimed offenders for their absence and issued their arrest warrants.
In the SGS reference filed in 1997, it was alleged that Siddiqi negotiated a pre-shipment contract between the Government of Pakistan and SGS to obtain pecuniary advantages for then prime minister Benazir Bhutto and her spouse Asif Ali Zardari on September 20, 1994.
They were accused of receiving kickbacks through the offshore bank accounts of Schlegelmilch.
The court referred to statements of various prosecution witnesses and arguments of defence counsel Muhammad Arshad Tabrez and said that the pre-shipment scheme and the award of contract to SGS and Cotecna had brought an additional Rs27 billion in the national exchequer.
“Indeed, for each dollar paid to the companies, the government benefited by nearly $7 in additional revenue. The pre-shipment inspection scheme also curtailed corruption in the customs department,” the judgment stated.
The defence attorney had argued that there was practically no evidence against the accused and that none of the prosecution witnesses had made any statement suggesting that the accused or co-accused had received any commissions and kickbacks.
The prosecution story on kickbacks and their deposit in the Geneva Bank has been falsified through the statement of prosecution witnesses 13 (who is also the investigation officer in the case) and 16, the court said.
The prosecution witnesses also admitted to the defence’s version that the relationship of the principal accused with foreign companies had not been established, and admitted that the pre-shipment scheme was first introduced in Pakistan in 1990 and a similar draft agreement was prepared during the government of Nawaz Sharif, but was not executed.
The court noted that prosecution witness 13 had admitted that he had not come across any evidence showing that Bhutto, Zardari and Siddiqui had collaborated and abused their authority in awarding the contract.
It said that not an iota of reliable and admissible evidence has come on record to prove allegations that SGS had given kickbacks to Zardari.
Prosecution witness 13 also admitted that Zardari had no concern with any bank account in Geneva relating to the offshore companies.
The verdict said that there is sufficient material on record to believe that idea of pre-shipment scheme was not floated for the first time in 1994 but that even in 1990 the SGS was selected for the award of contract through international bidding.
ARY case
The court also acquitted former commerce secretary Brig (retd) Aslam Hayat Qureshi, former principal secretary to president Salman Farooqi, three directors of ARY Gold Company – Haji Abdur Razzaq Yaqoob, Abdur Rauf and Jan Muhammad – in the case of giving and taking gold important licence in violation of the rules and regulations.
The proceedings in the case have already been dropped following the death of Bhutto because President Zardari already enjoys constitutional immunity.
The court, however, issued permanent arrest warrants for former finance secretary Javed Talat and declared him a proclaimed absconder for not appearing in the court.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 31st, 2011.
COMMENTS (26)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Can anybody answer a common sense question? Why are politicians only from Sind are prosecuted? Is there no corruption in the other provinces? Wouldn't it be better to try the Sind politicians in their local courts and Sind HC?
it shows how allegations based on bogus documents, followed by inquiries, regurgitating allegations and orchestrated media trials is the stuff by which anti people forces have all along sought to eliminate Bhuttos and keep them away from the people of Pakistan.
@parvez: it is because they have very conveniently become partner in crime . you scratch my back ....
@NomanAli:- My dear why do we quote statements, which are not even "CERTIFIED BY ITS ISSUERS"? Please see the comments in your referred link i.e. "thus several royals upon this list may have figures that underestimate their total financial standing because the wealth of their Crown is excluded. An example would be Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom, whose personal wealth was estimated in 2007 to be about US$600 million, while her Crown property (that is, Crown Property in right of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) as was estimated at about US$10 billion. (2) Why AZ is the only exception that his wealth is shown b/w 1.2 to 4 billion while others are reported in absolute figures? (3) Finally I agree with Mr. Imran's comparison with "Forbes List"
@Salman Orangiwala: That's the point. Its slander if you can't prove it!
There is no such thing as free judiciary, as cases are decided on the evidence presented.
Why it always happen that politicians get absolved during their own governments?
@Salma, Very well said indeed.
Another major victory of the independent judiciary.
Consider This........All accused have been acquitted, Asif Zardari has legal immunity...However, Jens Schlegelmilch and vice president Colin Robey have been declared proclaimed offenders and arrest warrants have been issued against them and many other SGS officials. It means all the Pakistani Politicians and bureaucrats have been allowed to go scott free. No official from SGS was cross-examined. And understandably no effort was made to make Jens Schlegelmilch and vice president Colin Robey appear in the court as that might have had an impact on the finall "not guilty" verdict.
Its always good to be in power when you have court cases against you..Under a different Govt..Courts might have reached a different conclusion. So much for the independant Judiciary :)))))
@Imran
Forbes publishes the OFFICIAL lists on declared wealth , not of parallely runned underground econo .Sonia Gandhi has a declared asset based on returns filed with the Taxation authority and she is the heiress of one the richest family of Italy as well , Mr.Zardari HAD a just a cinema hall in Karachi and maybe some inherited lands .
Dear Readers This country and its resources are actually meant for the powerful and rich, and to make them even more powerful and richer. We the poor fellows are born to pay income taxes, sales taxes, advance taxes, surcharges, fuel adjustment charges, gas charges, withholding taxes and God knows what other charges. So let them do their job and let us concentrate on our job.
@Nauman Ali: Another campaign of slander by the champions of justice. The list doesn't match with Forbes (http://www.forbes.com/wealth/billionaires). Besides, Sonia Gandhi with a worth of $18 billion? Please be realistic!
It is just an eyewash, they are playing Cats and Dogs game. May Allah Bless and Have Mercy on Pakistan always.
@Salma: I second you. These champions of independent judiciary, along with their followers, never believe in "fair judiciary". For them its independent only if there is one way victimization. Their entire politics is based on hatred, about which Nawaz Sharif once retorted that it boiled his blood when he heard the name of PPP.
@Nauman Ali: So?
Please visit this site for verification of AZ's net worth
http://exploredia.com/richest-politicians-in-the-world/
Scorpio why should he, if at all, explain that....if he acquired that through fair means. Secondly my point is that the aversion towards him started even before any acquisition of such property...the same propaganda was waged against BB also whose father was not a cinema owner (btw AZ was not just a cinema owner) so isn't it a maligning campaign towards ppp leadership..."not guilty untill convicted" and the medai and opposition have no right to convict him through media trials.
They can't return those 11 years back which President Asif Ali Zardari survived in Jail. But finally time has proved his innocence.finally justice has been delivered.No one can return those 11 years but Truth triumphed.
The law enforcement machinery and the judiciary cut a sorry picture.
@Salma: if mr. zardari could explain how a cinema hall owner acquired the werewithal and the means to acquire a chateu in France and have $60million in a swiss account, i for one would have no qualms about praising him for his financial acumen and sagacity.
Pakistan is really a free country where one can get away with murder,plunder,loot provided you have money or power.
Long live free judiciary
Some relief amidst the hostility; now look at the comment above....if he were convicted then it would have been a bright day...it's ironical that the champions of justice want it to be denied to AZ....I have always failed to understand why these so called champions including the media have waged a war against AZ and have declared him a convict through a mass propaganda...I have always absolutely failed to understand the aversion towards AZ....there is some psyche behind it...was it because he married the most beautiful, most charismatic most powerful women of Pakistan as I have observed the aversion since day one which has been endless. These people have been nasty enough to even convict him for BB's murder...what kind of moral, ethical and political thinking is this, it defies all logic, and religious and social ethics too.
Nawaz Sharif has once again been shamed by his undemocratic and cheap antics. Why there isn''t any law against those who make ficticious cases and waste public money, torture the innocent people. Nawaz Sharif should be made to pay the court for the time it has spent on the case and pay damages to the victims.
Pakistan benefited Rs 58 Billion a year because of these deals, which according to court order were on merit and transparent. Now let us request Supreme Court to decide Nawaz Sharif's money Laundering case as well, which is on its final stage.