West must do more to stop China buying up technology: Former UK spy chief

John Sawers, the chief of MI6 said China was seeking to expand its global clout

Reuters April 16, 2020
Britain's Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) chief, John Sawers, arrives for a meeting of the UK's National Security Council, at 10 Downing Street in London August 28, 2013. PHOTO: REUTERS

LONDON: The West needs to do more to stop China from buying up strategic technology including companies such as British semiconductor chip designer Imagination Technologies, the former head of Britain’s MI6 foreign intelligence service said on Thursday.

The British government should seek every mechanism to prevent the removal of the technology base of Imagination Technologies to China, including seeking a Western buyer for the company, British lawmakers have said.

Google’s Wear OS will remind you to wash your hands every few hours

John Sawers, the chief of Britain’s Secret Intelligence Service, or MI6, from 2009 to 2014, said China was seeking to expand its global clout, though it was not the same existential threat that the Soviet Union once was.

“I don’t think it’s an existential threat in the way the Soviet Union was in the Cold War but nevertheless there is going to be deep rivalry over control of technology,” Sawers told Sky.

“We have more to do in the West to make sure we are independent of China.”

Apple, Google plan software to slow virus, joining global debate on tracking

“We need to do more to protect Western technology from being bought up by Chinese companies and I think the efforts being made to ensure Imagination isn’t pulled out of the UK and bought up by China is the right thing to do.”

Imagination Technologies, which like larger rival ARM Holdings was one of the jewels in Britain’s technological crown, was bought by private equity firm Canyon Bridge in 2017. Canyon Bridge is in turn backed by Chinese state-owned China Reform holdings.


Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ