PHOTO: FILE

Economists upbeat on virus recovery

Others compare it to natural disaster, ‘worst crisis’ since Great Depression


Afp April 12, 2020
WASHINGTON: The coronavirus pandemic has hit like a worldwide hurricane, shutting activity in most economies simultaneously, but some forecasters are more optimistic about the prospects for recovery once the worst has passed.

International Monetary Fund Chief Kristalina Georgieva has called it the worst crisis since the Great Depression a century ago, and warned the damage could linger.

And yet there are private economists betting on a solid rebound as soon as people can get back to work.

With 1.5 million confirmed cases and 100,000 deaths, the virus has forced economies worldwide to shut down, which in the United States caused 17 million workers to lose their jobs in just three weeks.

Economists at the New York Federal Reserve Bank said the impact is more akin to a natural disaster like a hurricane, rather than a traditional financial or economic crisis.

In Pakistan, economists press for policy easing amid COVID-19 crisis

“Recessions typically develop gradually over time,” researchers Jason Bram and Richard Dietz said in a blog post Friday. “The coronavirus pandemic, in contrast, came on suddenly, hitting the economy at full force in one month.”

And like a hurricane, it first hit the travel and tourism industry, they said.

But unlike a natural disaster, the authors said the pandemic has not left physical destruction in its wake, “which may well facilitate a quicker economic recovery.”

Karen Dynan, a former US Treasury chief economist, is looking at a 20% drop in the American economy in April and May, leading to an 8% contraction for the year.

But Dynan, who helped produce the semi-annual forecast put out by the Peterson Institute for International Economics, is more upbeat about the recovery, projecting a 7.2% US rebound in 2021 year-over-year.

While US officials have expressed hope about a “V-shaped” recovery, with a sharp, rapid return to growth, private economists are more cautious given the uncertainty around the duration and severity of the pandemic.

“We’re getting the ‘checkmark’ not that classic V,” Dynan told reporters, referring to the steep decline and gradual recovery.

“We’re going to have to proceed slowly, in terms of opening up the economy again. And we’re going to have some setbacks,” she said, while acknowledging that many of her Peterson colleagues disagree with her more upbeat view.

IMF’s Georgieva warned that, even if the pandemic is contained quickly, with most countries seeing incomes decline the global economy likely will see only a “partial recovery” next year, and “it could get worse.”

Gregory Daco of Oxford Economics is less pessimistic about 2020 and less optimistic about 2021, estimating a 5.9% rebound next year.

Even with massive government spending in place, “the employment losses will be traumatic, and the rebound post-virus will be U-shaped with a full recovery taking 12 to 18 months,” he said.

With the massive infusions of cash to support large companies and small businesses, the US government’s finances will take a hit.

World Bank sees Pakistan’s economic growth sliding to 1%

But Treasury data for March released Friday do not yet show that impact yet. Outlays are actually lower than the same month of 2019, and receipts slightly higher.

For the fiscal year-to-date, from October to March, outlays and receipts each hit records of $2.35 trillion and $1.6 trillion, respectively.

But, a Treasury official told reporters, “I can say that we will certainly see a significant impact in the April numbers.”

Washington pushed the April 15 tax filing deadline back by three months, and the official says daily tax data from the second half of March have already shown a drop off.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 12th, 2020.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ