Make no mistake about it, Breivik is a terrorist. His acts were political in nature and deed. He targeted the heart of the political system in Norway in order to affect political change. Unweaving the intricacies of his ideology, though, is not easy. Breivik is a Christian fundamentalist and could be described as a right-wing radical, but he is not a neo-Nazi. In fact, he claims to be a Zionist. In his manifesto, publicised online on Friday, July 22, it is clear that Breivik was driven by rampant anti-Islamism, a hatred for Marxism and general disdain for multiculturalism. Breivik was advocating counter-jihad (ironically, he acknowledges drawing inspiration from al Qaeda), but as part of a larger plan to separate Europe from the rest of the world. Part of this process would include cleansing the European continent of Marxists and other perceived traitors. In that sense, Breivik is not strictly a nationalist, but a pan-European nationalist. It is in this light we have to examine Friday’s attacks. They were targeted at the political establishment in Norway, not immigrants. It was an attack against the system and the democracy that allows Norway to be an open society for people of all origins.
Europe has long struggled with right-wing radicals, a remnant of its fascist history. While it has rarely reached into the mainstream, every now and then a political party, be it in Austria or the United Kingdom, has come into the spotlight and been given a microphone for its xenophobic ideas. Most of the time, however, it has festered in the underbelly of society. In its latest open threat assessment, the Norwegian Police Security Service downplayed the risk of right-wing attacks but noted that new leadership could increase recruitment. Cooperation across borders with other likeminded radical groups could also become a danger. The fear now is that others will duplicate the acts of Breivik. His ideas could inspire others, as well as his methods. Unfortunately, it is nigh impossible to stop a lone wolf terrorist, because there is no network to infiltrate and no communication to intercept. Preventing such attacks from happening again will be difficult and will require all of society to speak up against the ideas at the root of Breivik’s convictions.
It is a cruel irony that attacks first thought to have been the work of a Muslim were, in fact, acts motivated by a hatred of Islam. This realisation comes with the lesson that the single most horrific act of violence in modern Norwegian history was perpetrated by one of our own. As we examine the rationale behind Breivik’s madness, we must also ask ourselves whether our own fear of external threats have helped such hatred grow. If there is anything to take away from this tragedy, besides an individual’s unlimited capacity for evil, it is that some of the worst monsters are the ones from within. It may be too early to say how Norwegians will respond to these tragic events, but Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg offered strong guidance: “We must never give up our values. We must show that our open society can pass this test too. That the answer to violence is even more democracy.” Norway will persevere. Though we mourn the loss of countless lives, our bonds of society are too strong for one madman to sever.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 26th, 2011.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ